Skip to main content

Security report for musclegirldirectory.com

Muscle Girl Directory · Other · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muscle Girl Directory is a niche online escort directory launched in early 2024, specializing in listings of muscular and fit female escorts and fitness models. The website operates primarily as an affiliate marketing platform, linking users to external escort service providers, predominantly via Slixa affiliate links. The business targets adult service consumers interested in this specific niche. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for content blocks, ad unblocker, and custom analytics. The hosting is provided by Hostinger, a reputable hosting provider. The website demonstrates basic design and content quality with moderate mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and no direct contact or incident response information is provided, which limits trust and compliance. User tracking is moderate via a custom analytics plugin. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professionalism and comprehensive security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching musclegirldirectory.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market segment focusing on muscular female escorts, differentiating itself from general escort directories. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing, generating revenue through referrals to partner escort platforms like Slixa. The site is relatively new, founded in 2024, and targets a specialized audience within the adult services industry. The lack of direct company contact information and absence of privacy or security policies suggest a lean operational model focused on content aggregation and affiliate monetization rather than direct service provision. The extensive network of external links and partner domains indicates a broad affiliate ecosystem. Growth potential depends on expanding content quality, improving trust signals, and enhancing compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and the domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, preventing unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of a custom analytics plugin suggests some level of user tracking but without clear privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  5. Conduct a security audit of plugins and scripts to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muscle Girl Directory
Description
A global guide featuring female bodybuilders, amazons and fitness models. The first escort directory exclusively featuring very fit and muscular women.
Key services
Escort directory listings, Affiliate links to escort profiles, Regional categorization of escorts, Advertising and banner placements
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Kadence Blocks plugin, Eazy Ad Unblocker plugin, Visitors Traffic Real Time Statistics plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Independent Analytics (custom plugin)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche escort directory focusing on muscular female escorts and fitness models.
  2. Content is mostly affiliate links to external escort sites.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No direct company contact information or support emails/phones found.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for ads and analytics.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Moderate user tracking via custom analytics plugin.
  8. Advertising mainly through Google Adsense and affiliate links.
  9. Design and content quality are basic with limited professionalism.
  10. No visible social media or official company contacts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Kadence Blocks for layout and additional plugins for ad unblocker and real-time visitor statistics. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and custom JavaScript for analytics and user interaction tracking. Hosting is provided by Hostinger operations, UAB, with domain registration consistent with the hosting provider. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The extensive use of affiliate links and external domains indicates a content aggregation model. Technical debt appears low but improvements in security and privacy implementations are needed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with musclegirldirectory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review musclegirldirectory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.