Skip to main content

Security report for murkskis.lv

Murkšķu audzētava "Jaunstuči" · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Murkšķu audzētava "Jaunstuči" is a small Latvian wildlife tourism business specializing in marmot breeding and education. The website provides detailed information about marmots, their habitat, and invites visitors to observe them during the active season. The business is locally focused with a niche market in nature tourism and education. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting families, tourists, and nature enthusiasts. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries and basic SEO and accessibility features, with room for modernization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and uses outdated libraries, which could pose risks. Privacy compliance is minimal with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clear and trustworthy, supporting business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche but could improve technical and security aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching murkskis.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche segment of wildlife tourism and education in Latvia, focusing on marmot observation and information dissemination. It leverages local tourism and educational visits as revenue streams. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration and regular news updates, indicating engagement with its audience. The business model is straightforward, relying on seasonal visits and educational outreach. Partnerships with local sites such as teteris.lv and regi.lv suggest community integration. Growth potential may be limited by niche focus but stable due to unique offering. No evidence of large-scale commercial operations or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.4.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed data protection policies. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from security hardening and compliance improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and security policy outlining data protection and incident response.
  5. Perform regular security audits and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Murkšķu audzētava "Jaunstuči"
Description
Murkšķu audzētava "Jaunstuči" is a marmot breeding farm located in Reģi, Alsungas novads, Latvia. It provides information about marmots, their habitat, and invites visitors to observe marmots during the active season. The site is managed by Silvija Tetere.
Key services
Marmot observation tours, Educational content about marmots, Visitor information and contact
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.3, Google Analytics (gtag.js), HTML5 shiv (html5.js), CSS reset and custom stylesheets
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on a niche wildlife tourism business in Latvia.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found, only a privacy policy link in footer with basic content.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or contact page; contact is via email and phone only.
  5. Uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  6. Social media presence is well linked and consistent.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML/CSS layout with jQuery 1.4.3 for scripting and Google Analytics for tracking. It includes conditional scripts for legacy IE support and custom JavaScript files. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework, indicating a static or custom-built platform. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization noted. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. The site would benefit from modernization to improve maintainability, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with murkskis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review murkskis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.