Skip to main content

Security report for mulcol.com

Mulcol International · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mulcol International is a specialized manufacturer of innovative passive fire stopping products, targeting construction professionals and fire safety specialists. The company appears to be a small-sized manufacturer established in 2015, with a focused niche in fire protection solutions. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website uses modern libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, but lacks DNSSEC and some recommended HTTP security headers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with a clear consent mechanism, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service documents were found in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, with moderate user tracking primarily through Google Analytics and Cookiebot. Strategic improvements include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and enhancing HTTP security headers to strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mulcol.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mulcol.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mulcol.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mulcol International operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on passive fire stopping products. Their business model centers on product manufacturing and supply to construction and fire safety markets. The company likely targets architects, engineers, and safety consultants requiring fire protection solutions. The website's market position is that of a niche specialist with a modern approach to product innovation. The absence of extensive business contact information or partner domains limits deeper business intelligence insights. However, the use of Cookiebot and Cloudflare indicates a commitment to compliance and security. No affiliate or partner domains were identified, suggesting a direct-to-business sales approach. The company’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and detailed business disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. The use of Cloudflare DNS provides additional security and performance benefits. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Cookie consent is properly managed, denying ad personalization by default, which aligns with GDPR principles. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the site's readiness for handling security incidents. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the website.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and minimize tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mulcol International
Description
Mulcol International a modern manufacturer of innovative passive fire stopping products
Key services
manufacturing of passive fire stopping products, fire stopping solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with denied ad personalization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with clear consent categories
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided
  4. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled
  5. Multiple cookies and trackers from Google and Cookiebot detected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No data protection officer contact information found
  8. Website content is focused on manufacturing passive fire stopping products
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. Website is professionally designed with good SEO and mobile optimization
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and common technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap for responsive design, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing purposes, integrated with Cookiebot for consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mulcol.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mulcol.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.