Skip to main content

Security report for mukyjov.cz

Město Kyjov · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mukyjov.cz serves as a municipal portal for the city of Kyjov, Czech Republic, providing a centralized gateway to various government and partner services such as webmail, cloud storage, map servers, employee portals, and legal information access. The site is modest in design and content, focusing on functionality over marketing or commercial engagement. It targets residents, municipal employees, and stakeholders requiring access to official municipal resources. From a technical perspective, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is provided by REG-WEBGLOBE, a known registrar and hosting provider. The site includes a seasonal snowflake animation script active in late December, indicating some attention to user experience. However, the site lacks advanced SEO, accessibility features, and modern performance optimizations. Security posture is minimal but not alarming. No security headers or explicit HTTPS status was detected in the provided data, and no forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The domain is long-established since 1999, consistent with a legitimate government entity. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy as a government portal but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and contact transparency to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mukyjov.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mukyjov.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Město Kyjov operates as a local government entity providing essential municipal services and digital access points to residents and employees. Its market position is that of a regional government authority with a stable presence since 1999. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery through digital means. Key services include municipal information dissemination, employee portals, legal and cadastral access, and cloud services. The target audience is primarily local citizens and municipal staff. The partnership ecosystem includes legal information providers (ASPI), cadastral services, and employee management platforms (Vema). Growth indicators are not evident from the website, reflecting the stable nature of government operations. The site’s simplicity and limited content suggest a focus on utility rather than competitive advantage or revenue generation.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website does not expose sensitive data or contain forms that could be exploited. However, the lack of security headers and absence of HTTPS confirmation in the provided data are weaknesses. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which limits the ability to report or respond to security issues effectively. GDPR compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible indicators of proactive security management. Business impact of these gaps is moderate given the non-commercial nature of the site but should be addressed to maintain trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced and SSL/TLS configuration is verified for secure communications.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Kyjov
Description
The website serves as a portal or gateway (Rozcestník) for the Municipal Office of Kyjov (MěÚ Kyjov), providing links to various municipal and related services.
Key services
Municipal website, Webmail, Cloud services, Map server, Employee portal, Legal information access (ASPI), Remote cadastral access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to secure
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple municipal portal with basic navigation and limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed on the page.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  7. External links point to relevant government and partner services.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools present.
  9. The site uses a custom snowflake animation script active only in late December.
  10. Logo image is present at /logo.png with alt text 'Logo'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies (HTML5, CSS, JavaScript) without use of popular CMS or frameworks. Hosting is provided by REG-WEBGLOBE, a reputable provider. The site includes a seasonal JavaScript animation for snowflakes, indicating some user experience consideration. Performance is moderate with no detected heavy scripts or resources. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Technical risks are low but modernization opportunities exist to improve compliance, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mukyjov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mukyjov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.