Skip to main content

Security report for mubea-supplier.de

Mubea · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mubea operates a supplier portal accessible via the eu.srm.qad.com domain, providing a secure login interface for its suppliers and business partners. The portal is part of Mubea's digital infrastructure to manage supplier relationships efficiently. The website is primarily in German with multi-language support, reflecting its European market focus. The business is positioned as a large manufacturing entity with a B2B supplier management model. Technically, the portal uses a JavaScript-based stack with jQuery, FontAwesome, and WalkMe for user guidance, running on the QAD SRM platform version 6.4.7. The site is functional and accessible without WAF or security challenges blocking content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and secure login forms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, reducing domain registration trustworthiness, though corporate branding and links to Mubea's official site provide legitimacy. Overall, the site is basic in design and content quality, suitable for its purpose but with room for technical and security improvements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mubea-supplier.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mubea-supplier.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mubea is a well-established manufacturing company leveraging digital supplier portals to streamline supplier interactions. The portal targets suppliers and business partners, facilitating secure access and information exchange. The business model is B2B focused, with a strong emphasis on supplier relationship management. The lack of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or domain registration issues, which could be a risk factor. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and provides privacy policy links, indicating compliance awareness. However, absence of detailed contact information and security policies on the portal limits transparency. The use of WalkMe indicates investment in user experience and onboarding. The portal's market position is stable within manufacturing, but digital maturity could be enhanced with better security and compliance features.

Security posture

The security posture of the portal is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and secure login forms with support for one-time passwords, indicating multi-factor authentication capabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are linked, limiting transparency on security governance. The cookie disclaimer is present but lacks an explicit consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration opacity reduce trust in domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, explicit privacy and security policies, and improved compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against attacks.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible from the portal.
  4. Improve accessibility and SEO features to enhance usability and discoverability.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use verified domain registration to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mubea
Description
Mubea is a manufacturing company providing supplier portal services for business partners and suppliers.
Key services
Supplier portal access, Supplier information management, Authentication and secure login
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, FontAwesome, WalkMe
Frameworks
QAD SRM 6.4.7
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with password and OTP fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WalkMe
Marketing tools
WalkMe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a supplier portal login page for Mubea, a manufacturing company.
  2. Content is in German with multi-language support links.
  3. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  4. No visible security headers in HTML content; HTTPS usage assumed but not confirmed.
  5. Uses WalkMe for user guidance and tracking.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism despite cookie disclaimer.
  7. No visible contact phone number; only email contact text without explicit email address.
  8. No social media links found on login page.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages linked.
  10. Login form includes username, password, OTP, and 'login as' fields indicating multi-factor authentication support.
Technical notes

Notes

The portal is built on a JavaScript-heavy stack with jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements, and WalkMe for user guidance and tracking. It runs on the QAD SRM 6.4.7 platform, a specialized supplier relationship management system. The site loads multiple external scripts from cdn.walkme.com and related domains, indicating reliance on third-party services for user experience enhancements. The HTML structure is basic but functional, with responsive design elements present but limited. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA or semantic enhancements not evident. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a supplier portal but could be modernized and optimized further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium22 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mubea-supplier.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mubea-supplier.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.