Skip to main content

Security report for mtnc.no

MTNC · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MTNC operates a corporate website hosted on WordPress using the Uncode theme, targeting a general audience primarily in Norway. The website is minimalistic with limited business description and no explicit contact or policy pages visible. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Cookiebot for consent management and Google Tag Manager, although Google Analytics is not fully configured. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a basic level of security, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service documentation. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires improvements in transparency and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mtnc.no

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MTNC appears to be a small-sized business established in 2018, with no detailed public business model or sector information available on the website. The lack of visible contact information and business descriptions limits competitive analysis. The presence of Cookiebot and Google services suggests an intent to comply with privacy regulations and track user engagement, although incomplete configuration reduces effectiveness. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the domain or content. The website's minimal content and basic branding indicate an early-stage or low-profile online presence.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, which is a positive indicator for GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not fully configured, potentially limiting analytics accuracy. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Complete the configuration of Google Analytics to ensure accurate data collection and reporting.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTNC
Description
No explicit business description found in the HTML content. The site appears to be a corporate or organizational website with no detailed business info visible.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, ExactMetrics (Google Analytics plugin)
Frameworks
Uncode WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (ExactMetrics plugin)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (ExactMetrics plugin)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Uncode theme.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers visible in the HTML content.
  5. Google Analytics plugin is installed but not fully configured (no tracking code set).
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Website content is minimal and mostly technical with cookie consent dialog visible.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Uncode theme and uses jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site loads asynchronously scripts for emoji support and analytics. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated as good. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses persistent cookies and local storage for WebP image support and emoji settings. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mtnc.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mtnc.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.