Skip to main content

Security report for mst.pl

MST Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. · Manufacturing · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MST Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. is a medium-sized Polish manufacturer specializing in high-quality lighting components and electronic modules, serving the lighting industry for over a decade. The company offers a broad portfolio including LED modules, LED drivers, HID systems, and contract manufacturing services (ODM/EMS). MST holds important certifications such as ISO 9001, DEKRA accreditation, and ENEC Plus, reinforcing its market credibility and quality standards. Strategic partnerships with global players like LEDiL, Arrow Electronics, and Electro Terminal further strengthen its market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO, GDPR compliance, and user interaction. The site is mobile-optimized, uses HTTPS, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. From a security perspective, MST demonstrates good practices with encrypted communications, validated contact forms, and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the overall legitimacy indicated by the website content and certifications. Overall, MST presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with solid business and technical foundations. Continued improvements in security headers and transparency around incident response would enhance its security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mst.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MST operates in the manufacturing sector focused on lighting components, targeting B2B customers in Europe and beyond. Its business model combines product manufacturing with ODM/EMS services, enabling flexible client solutions. The company leverages certifications and strategic partnerships to differentiate itself in a competitive market. Growth indicators include recent product launches, acquisition of production lines, and expansion of facilities. The partnership ecosystem with LEDiL, Arrow, and Electro Terminal supports innovation and distribution. MST's operations reflect a stable medium-sized enterprise with a decade-long market presence and a focus on quality and compliance.

Security posture

MST's security maturity is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Contact forms have validation and privacy notices. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The company has a designated Data Protection Officer contact, indicating awareness of data protection responsibilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Overall, MST should enhance header security and publish incident response details to improve its security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MST Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.
Registration number
0000355294
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MST Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.
Description
Producer and supplier of high-quality lighting components and electronic modules for the lighting industry with over 10 years of experience.
Key services
Production of LED modules (indoor, outdoor, UVC), LED drivers, HID systems and ballasts, Compensation coils, Electromagnetic fluorescent ballasts, ODM/EMS design and contract manufacturing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Google Fonts (Lato, Open Sans), Swiper.js for sliders, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Akismet (anti-spam), jQuery 3.6.0 (commented out but referenced)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is unusual but not uncommon for .pl domains with registry delay.
  3. Strong presence of certifications and compliance with GDPR.
  4. Contact information is clear and professional.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented properly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.1 with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and GDPR Cookie Compliance. It employs Google Fonts and Swiper.js for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS/JS assets. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks some advanced security headers but otherwise follows modern web development practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mst.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mst.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.