Skip to main content

Security report for msssboskovice.cz

Městská správa sociálních služeb Boskovice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městská správa sociálních služeb Boskovice is a municipal social services organization providing care and support primarily for seniors and special needs groups in the Boskovice region of the Czech Republic. The website serves as an information portal for clients, families, and the community, offering details on services, events, meal plans, and contact information. The organization is positioned as a local government entity with a focus on social welfare and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a variety of plugins including Slider Revolution and photo gallery tools, delivering a responsive and accessible user experience. The site uses HTTPS and includes some security measures such as an anti-bot script, but lacks explicit security headers which could enhance protection. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements in security headers and regular plugin updates are recommended. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and minimal user tracking. Business credibility is supported by official municipal affiliation, certifications, and comprehensive contact information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, serving its community role effectively. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, suggesting a need for further domain registration transparency checks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching msssboskovice.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on social services for seniors and vulnerable populations. Its business model is publicly funded and community-oriented, with key services including residential care homes, special regime homes, care services, and compensatory aids rental. The website reflects a stable local market position with strong ties to municipal authorities and social service associations. The content and structure indicate a medium-sized entity with consistent branding and trust signals such as certifications and official contact details. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government and social service organizations, enhancing credibility and resource access.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security plugins. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a compliance gap. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance security culture and readiness. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating good data protection practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Increase transparency of domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy verification.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Městská správa sociálních služeb Boskovice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská správa sociálních služeb Boskovice
Description
Městská správa sociálních služeb Boskovice is a contributory organization established by the City of Boskovice, providing social services including senior homes, special regime homes, and care services.
Key services
Senior home care, Special regime home care, Care services, Compensatory aids rental, Meal delivery for social service users
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.4, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Photo Gallery plugin, Mega Menu plugin, Bootstrap (via pe-easy-slider plugin), Google Fonts (Ubuntu, Roboto, Source Sans Pro)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugin (wp-simple-firewall)
  • Anti-bot protection script included

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. Content is focused on social services for seniors and community engagement.
  4. Multiple official and partner links to government and social organizations.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious setup.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and multiple plugins for enhanced functionality such as event calendars, photo galleries, and sliders. The use of Google Fonts and CDN-hosted libraries improves performance and user experience. Accessibility features including WCAG contrast and font size controls are implemented, supporting inclusive design. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, the performance is moderate, suggesting potential optimization opportunities. Security-related technical debt includes missing security headers and reliance on multiple third-party plugins which require vigilant maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with msssboskovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review msssboskovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.