Skip to main content

Security report for mssf.cz

Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mssf.cz serves as an official government portal for the Czech Republic's Ministry of Regional Development, providing monitoring and administrative systems for European structural funds across multiple programming periods (2007-2013, 2014-2020, and 2021-2027). It targets applicants, project managers, and government officials involved in the management and evaluation of EU-funded projects. The platform offers various portals for application submission, project administration, and data analysis, reflecting a comprehensive service model for structural fund management. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, featuring a clean and consistent design optimized for desktop and mobile devices. The site links to multiple subdomains hosting specialized portals but does not reveal use of advanced frameworks or CMS platforms in the provided content. Performance and accessibility are moderate to good, though SEO and technical metadata could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and typical government standards), but no explicit security headers or policies were found in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policies, but the domain and content strongly indicate legitimacy as a government entity. Contact information is provided with official addresses and phone numbers, but no email contacts or incident response details are present. Overall, the website is a trustworthy government resource with good content quality and business credibility but would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and WHOIS transparency to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mssf.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a critical government platform supporting the administration and monitoring of EU structural funds in the Czech Republic. Its market position is strong as an official ministry resource, serving a niche audience of applicants, project administrators, and evaluators. The business model is service-oriented, providing digital tools and portals to facilitate fund management and reporting. Revenue streams are government-funded, with no commercial transactions evident. The partnership ecosystem includes related government domains and EU fund information portals. Growth indicators are stable, aligned with EU programming cycles. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance and security to uphold trust in public fund management.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended for government sites to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. No forms or user input fields were found on the main page, reducing attack surface. Overall, the site appears secure but could improve by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add a dedicated security incident response page with contact information for reporting vulnerabilities or incidents.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data transparency or provide official registrant information on the website to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update technical infrastructure to maintain performance, accessibility, and security best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR
Description
The website provides portals and administrative systems for managing European structural funds and projects for programming periods 2007-2013, 2014-2020, and 2021-2027. It serves applicants, project administrators, and strategy holders related to EU structural funds.
Key services
Administration of funding applications, Project administration, Application management, Data analysis tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government portal for managing EU structural funds across multiple programming periods.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact information is present but no email addresses found.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; links lead to external portals.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  7. No security headers visible from provided data.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy or registry restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. No advanced frameworks or CMS platforms were detected in the provided content. The site is mobile responsive with a clean layout and consistent branding. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques observed. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO metadata is minimal, lacking Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mssf.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mssf.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.