Skip to main content

Security report for mspglobal.com

MSP GLOBAL · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MSP GLOBAL is a leading European event organizer specializing in managed service providers and IT professionals. The company hosts a large-scale conference featuring over 3,500 participants, 120+ speakers, and 100+ partners, focusing on digital transformation, cybersecurity, and business growth. The event is held at a unique venue in Barcelona, Spain, and offers networking, masterclasses, and product premieres. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, providing a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, anti-spam, and bot detection, though explicit security policies and incident response details are missing. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces transparency but does not undermine the site's legitimacy. Overall, MSP GLOBAL presents a trustworthy and well-established brand in the MSP event space.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mspglobal.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mspglobal.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
36
Employees
0
Customers
36
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
14%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mspglobal.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets MSPs, IT consultants, and digital service resellers, positioning itself as the only international MSP event in Europe. Its business model revolves around event hosting, sponsorships, and educational content delivery. The presence of high-profile speakers and extensive partner networks indicates strong market positioning and growth potential. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting credibility. The use of multiple registration domains suggests a mature operational setup. Lack of public WHOIS data is common in event businesses for privacy reasons but should be monitored.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements multiple security headers, anti-spam measures, and bot detection, indicating a mature security posture. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and GDPR-aligned policies. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response information and adding a security.txt file to enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with contact details.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Clarify and expand contact information for security and privacy inquiries.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
MSP GLOBAL
VAT number
DE341007872
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MSP GLOBAL
Description
MSP GLOBAL is a premier international event and conference for managed service providers and IT professionals, focused on digital transformation, cybersecurity, sales, and partnerships. It gathers top decision-makers and industry leaders for networking, learning, and product premieres.
Key services
Conference hosting, Networking events, Masterclasses and workshops, Exhibition and product premieres
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms, Swiper.js, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, CookieFirst Consent, WonderPush (Push Notifications), Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam plugin active
  • Bot detection enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Marketing tools
WonderPush
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Professional event focused on MSP industry in Europe
  3. Strong social media presence and speaker lineup
  4. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. No obvious security or privacy policy gaps except missing explicit security policy page
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly privacy protected or unregistered
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for optimization, Gravity Forms for data collection, and multiple JavaScript libraries including Swiper.js for UI components. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and WonderPush. Cookie consent is managed by CookieFirst. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in hosting and caching. No hosting provider details were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional event website with modern features and good user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mspglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mspglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.