Skip to main content

Security report for mrva.eu

Sedo.com · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sedo.com operates as a well-established domain marketplace, offering domain sales, transfer services, and personal assistance to a global audience of domain buyers and sellers. The platform supports multiple payment methods and provides a clear, professional user interface focused on facilitating domain transactions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js and integrates a cookie consent mechanism via Usercentrics, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is hosted on Sedo's infrastructure with content delivery via their CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enabled and standard security practices observed, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional domain marketplace with clear business credibility and compliance with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrva.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sedo.com holds a significant market position as a domain marketplace with over 26 years of experience and a high volume of domain transfers monthly. Its business model centers on facilitating domain sales and transfers, supported by a variety of payment options and personal assistance services. The company targets domain investors, businesses, and individuals seeking domain acquisition or sales. Trust indicators include visible payment logos, contact information, and language support. The platform's ecosystem includes partnerships with major payment providers such as PayPal, American Express, and Alipay, enhancing its service reliability and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Security best practices such as secure forms and input validation are implied. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or a security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with privacy compliance but could be enhanced with more detailed disclosures. No critical security issues were detected, and the overall security score is high.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit Content-Security-Policy headers to enhance protection against XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
  4. Improve SEO by adding comprehensive meta tags and structured data for better search engine visibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sedo.com
Description
Sedo is a domain marketplace offering domain sales, transfers, and related services.
Key services
Domain sales, Domain transfer service, Personal assistance, Various payment methods
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5, Usercentrics CMP, Cloudflare (implied by challenge script)
Frameworks
Vue.js (implied by data-v-app attribute), Usercentrics for cookie consent
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with input validation implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (UA-33740162-1)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain marketplace sales page for mrva.eu
  2. Clear call to action for buying or making an offer
  3. Multiple payment methods supported
  4. Contact information is clearly provided
  5. No signs of WAF or blocking
  6. Uses modern web technologies and cookie consent
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Vue.js and Usercentrics for cookie management. It is hosted on Sedo's infrastructure with assets served from their CDN. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with a clean and professional design. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical implementation follows standard web development practices, but lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrva.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrva.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.