Skip to main content

Security report for mrkaraoke.lv

Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mrkaraoke.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page powered by BitNinja.IO, which implements browser integrity checks and automated redirects. The visible content is minimal, showing only a placeholder page with references to outdated CMS platforms Joomla! 1.5 and WordPress 2.5. There is no visible business branding, contact information, or privacy-related policies. The domain uses Latvian nameservers consistent with its country code, but no registrant details are provided. The site appears to be protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF), limiting direct content access and analysis. Technically, the site relies on legacy CMS versions known for multiple security vulnerabilities, lacks modern security headers, and does not show evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. The user experience is poor due to the blocking page and lack of content. No analytics, advertising, or social media integrations are detected. From a security perspective, the presence of a WAF is a positive indicator, but the use of outdated CMS software and absence of privacy and cookie policies represent significant risks and compliance gaps. The lack of contact information and business details further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include upgrading the CMS to supported versions, implementing HTTPS and security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance. A comprehensive security audit is advised to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrkaraoke.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mrkaraoke.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mrkaraoke.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain appears to be small scale and possibly related to karaoke services given the domain name, but no explicit business description or services are provided. The site does not demonstrate active marketing, customer engagement, or partnership information. The absence of contact details and policies suggests a low level of digital maturity and limited market presence. No revenue streams, growth indicators, or strategic partnerships are visible.

Security posture

The website is protected by a WAF (BitNinja.IO), which provides a baseline defense against automated attacks and malicious traffic. However, the use of Joomla! 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both outdated and vulnerable CMS versions, exposes the site to significant security risks. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement are evident, and no incident response or security policies are published. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is weak despite the presence of a WAF, and urgent remediation is needed to address CMS vulnerabilities and compliance gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade Joomla! and WordPress installations to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including email and phone to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a security challenge page with automated redirect and browser integrity check, indicating WAF or security protection (BitNinja.IO). Content is blocked from direct access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Joomla!
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
25/100
Good practices seen
  • Browser integrity check script
  • Automated redirect with countdown
  • Security check by BitNinja.IO

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a security challenge page.
  2. Uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are vulnerable.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details visible.
  5. Security check powered by BitNinja.IO indicates active WAF protection.
  6. Minimal content and no visible business branding or marketing information.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No social media or email contacts found.
  9. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with domain location.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla! 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are no longer supported and contain multiple known security vulnerabilities. The HTML content includes JavaScript for browser integrity checks and automated redirects, indicating a security challenge page likely implemented by BitNinja.IO WAF. The site uses Latvian nameservers from areait.lv, suggesting local hosting. There is no evidence of modern analytics, advertising, or social media integration. The site lacks visible SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is outdated and requires modernization to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrkaraoke.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrkaraoke.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.