Skip to main content

Security report for mposervices.com

MPOservices · Manufacturing · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MPOservices is a small business specializing in manufacturing process optimization and automation, offering ERP system implementations and custom software development services. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a strategic partnership with Klaes, a global leader in software solutions for the window, door, and facade industry. The website content is basic but provides a clear overview of their services and partnerships. Technically, the website uses simple HTML and CSS without advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are critical for modern web security and trust. No contact information or policies are present, limiting user trust and regulatory compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and business transparency to enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mposervices.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MPOservices operates in the manufacturing and technology sectors, focusing on process optimization and ERP solutions. Their business model is B2B, targeting manufacturing companies seeking efficiency improvements through software. The strategic partnership with Klaes enhances their market position by associating with a recognized industry leader. The absence of detailed company information, contact data, and compliance policies suggests a small or early-stage business with limited digital maturity. The website's basic design and limited content indicate potential for growth in branding and market presence. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, implying minimal digital marketing efforts currently.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate risk of data leakage but also limiting user engagement. The lack of incident response contacts and security frameworks indicates low security maturity. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. To improve, the company should implement HTTPS, add security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear contact information for security incidents. These steps will enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MPOservices
Description
MPOservices specializes in manufacturing process optimization and automation, providing ERP system implementations and custom software development services. They offer bespoke information systems development, implementation, testing, software design, integration, and maintenance. They have a strategic partnership with Klaes, a leading software solutions provider for window, door, and facade businesses.
Key services
Manufacturing process optimization, ERP system implementation, Custom software development, Software testing and maintenance, Systems integration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No HTTPS detected in provided data; site uses HTTP links only.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. No social media links or security incident response contacts present.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
  7. Site content is basic with limited branding and trust signals.
  8. Partner domain klaes.com is referenced and linked.
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the HTML content.
  10. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics scripts are present, indicating minimal technical complexity. The site uses HTTP links without HTTPS, which is a critical security gap. Performance appears moderate based on content size and structure, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. The lack of structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) limits SEO potential. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mposervices.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mposervices.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.