Skip to main content

Security report for mpcterbank.be

Other · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mpcterbank.be appears to be a WordPress-based site focused on providing support for children and youth with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities, often combined with behavioral and emotional disorders. The content is primarily informational and supportive, targeting caregivers and families of affected individuals. The site uses modern web technologies including the Astra theme, Elementor page builder, and integrates marketing tools such as Mailchimp. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and compliance posture. The WHOIS data is restricted and incomplete, limiting the ability to verify domain legitimacy and ownership details. HTTPS is enabled, providing basic transport security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mpcterbank.be

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website seems to operate in the healthcare or social support sector, focusing on vulnerable populations such as children and youth with intellectual disabilities. The site does not reveal detailed business models, revenue streams, or partnerships. The presence of a hotel booking plugin suggests possible accommodation or event services, but this is not clearly detailed. The lack of contact and legal information reduces transparency and may affect user trust. The site is likely small in size and local in scope, with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. The business appears to have moderate branding consistency but limited trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is essential for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of visible incident response contacts or security policies indicates a lack of formal security governance. The site uses third-party scripts like Mailchimp, which may introduce tracking but no analytics or advanced security tools were identified. The restricted WHOIS data and lack of registrant transparency reduce domain trust. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are complete and publicly accessible where possible.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities, and establish an incident response plan.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be about supporting children and youth with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities, often combined with additional behavioral and emotional disorders.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Elementor, MotoPress Hotel Booking Lite, jQuery, Font Awesome, Mailchimp
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is restricted and incomplete, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Astra theme and Elementor page builder.
  4. Site includes a hotel booking plugin, possibly for accommodation services.
  5. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. HTTPS is enabled, indicating basic security.
  9. Content is focused on social support for children and youth with disabilities.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It integrates the MotoPress Hotel Booking Lite plugin, suggesting some booking or reservation functionality. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets including jQuery and Font Awesome, and uses Mailchimp for marketing popups. Performance appears moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization in place. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no security headers were detected. Technical debt appears low but the site would benefit from improved security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mpcterbank.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mpcterbank.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.