Skip to main content

Security report for mpc.lv

Juridiskais birojs MP · Government · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Juridiskais birojs MP is a Latvian legal office providing a wide range of legal services including corporate legal servicing, insolvency processes, debt collection, family law, administrative law, insurance law, labor law, intellectual property, real estate transactions, sports law, and document translation. The firm serves both local and international clients, including government and municipal institutions as well as commercial entities. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and Russian, which broadens its accessibility to diverse client groups. The business positions itself as experienced and responsible, emphasizing quality and client satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Fluida theme and several plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Cryout Serious Slider. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with a moderate performance profile. However, it lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but no security headers were detected, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security hardening. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain trust assessment, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and professional legal services provider. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap that should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Strategically, the firm should focus on enhancing its privacy compliance, implementing security headers, and providing clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to strengthen trust and security posture. These improvements will help maintain client confidence and regulatory compliance in an increasingly security-conscious market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mpc.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The legal office operates in a competitive market serving a broad client base including government, municipal, and private sector clients. Its multilingual approach and comprehensive service offerings position it well for regional and international clients. The business model is based on professional legal consulting, representation, and document services. The firm leverages a medium-sized team of experienced lawyers and advocates, which is a competitive advantage. The website's content quality and branding consistency support a professional image. However, the lack of visible certifications or trust badges may limit perceived credibility. The firm could benefit from strategic partnerships and enhanced digital marketing to expand its market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure contact forms in use. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security culture appears basic but can be improved with targeted measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Juridiskais birojs MP
Description
Juridiskais birojs MP is a legal office providing comprehensive legal services including company legal servicing, insolvency processes, debt collection, family law, administrative law, insurance law, labor law, intellectual property, real estate transactions, sports law, and document translation. They serve local and international clients including state and municipal institutions and commercial entities.
Key services
Company legal servicing, Insolvency and legal protection, Debt collection, Family law (divorce, inheritance, maintenance), Administrative law, Insurance law, Labor law, Intellectual property, Real estate transactions, Sports law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Cryout Serious Slider, MotoPress Content Editor Lite
Frameworks
WordPress Theme Fluida
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is multilingual (Latvian, English, Russian) targeting diverse clients.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes indicates moderate technical maturity.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  7. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Social media links are placeholders or generic, no verified company social profiles found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Fluida theme and uses several plugins such as Contact Form 7 for forms, Cryout Serious Slider for sliders, and MotoPress Content Editor Lite for content editing. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from security enhancements and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mpc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mpc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.