Skip to main content

Security report for mpb.cz

Městská policie Brno · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městská policie Brno is the official municipal police authority serving the city of Brno, Czech Republic. The website provides comprehensive information about their law enforcement services, animal shelter operations, public prevention programs, employment opportunities, and media communications. The target audience primarily includes residents and visitors of Brno seeking official police information and services. The business operates as a government entity with a medium organizational size and a clear public service mandate. Technically, the website is built on the Public4u CMS platform and utilizes common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, although some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, and the site uses HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism, indicating attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks visible security headers, which could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. GDPR compliance is evident with a dedicated privacy policy and cookie consent. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain registration trustworthiness, but the official nature of the site and consistent branding mitigate concerns. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its public service role effectively. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to strengthen security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mpb.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Městská policie Brno holds a strong market position as the official municipal police force for Brno, providing essential public safety and community services. Their business model is government-funded public service, focusing on law enforcement, animal shelter management, and public education. The website supports recruitment and community engagement, indicating growth and outreach efforts. Partnerships with local government and social service organizations are evident through linked domains. The organization leverages digital channels including social media and podcasts to enhance public communication. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract from the clear legitimacy and operational transparency demonstrated on the site.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms align with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Compliance with GDPR is demonstrated, but incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented. The use of third-party analytics and scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government website but could be enhanced with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to the public.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Maintain transparent communication regarding data protection officer contacts and privacy practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská policie Brno
Description
Official website of the Municipal Police of Brno, providing information about the police services, shelter for animals, prevention programs, employment, contact details, media, and public information.
Key services
Law enforcement and public safety, Animal shelter and adoption services, Public prevention and education programs, Employment and recruitment information, Media and public communications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Translate widget
Frameworks
Public4u CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain status.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanism.
  4. Official government entity with clear contact details and social media presence.
  5. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  6. Use of standard analytics and tracking tools with moderate user tracking.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy but stable CMS platform (Public4u) with jQuery and Google Analytics integration. The technical infrastructure supports mobile responsiveness and SEO best practices, though performance is moderate rather than fast. The site lacks advanced modern frameworks but maintains functional and accessible design. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve performance metrics. The absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate technical debt that should be addressed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mpb.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mpb.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.