Skip to main content

Security report for mozzartbet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mozzartbet.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, which prevents retrieval of any substantive content or business information. The domain is registered since 2007 with a reputable registrar and shows no signs of suspicious registration patterns. However, the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess the company's business model, services, or compliance posture. The site is protected by Cloudflare, indicating an intent to secure the platform, but the current blocking status severely restricts analysis. From a technical perspective, the site relies on Cloudflare for security and DNS services but lacks DNSSEC implementation. No metadata, structured data, or business contact information is available on the blocked page. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no forms or tracking technologies are present in the accessible content. This results in a low digital maturity and compliance visibility. Security posture assessment is constrained by the lack of accessible content and headers. The domain registration is consistent and long-standing, which supports legitimacy, but the absence of visible security headers and policies is a concern. The site should improve transparency by publishing privacy and security policies and ensuring legitimate users are not blocked by WAF rules. Overall, the site currently presents a high risk due to inaccessibility and lack of transparency. Strategic recommendations include resolving WAF blocking issues, enabling DNSSEC, publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and improving content accessibility to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mozzartbet.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mozzartbet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
54,193
Employees
24
Customers
54,008
Third parties
161
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-05-29 · 66 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mozzartbet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.mozzartbet.com2026-05-29
  • –mozzartbet.com2026-01-11
  • –mail.mozzartbet.com2026-01-10
  • –mail.mozzartbet.com2025-08-20
  • –mail.mozzartbet.com2025-08-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare block, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website content. The domain age and registrar data suggest an established entity, likely operating in the gambling or betting sector given the domain name 'mozzartbet.com'. The lack of accessible content prevents analysis of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. No contact or corporate information is available to verify business operations or customer segments. The company appears to rely on Cloudflare for security and hosting, but no further technical or business ecosystem details are visible.

Security posture

The security posture is currently limited by the Cloudflare WAF block, which indicates active protection against online attacks but also restricts legitimate access. No security headers or SSL configuration details are visible from the blocked page. The domain registration is stable and protected against transfer, which is positive. However, the absence of DNSSEC and visible security policies reduces overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site should address WAF configuration to avoid blocking legitimate users and publish security policies to improve transparency and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve Cloudflare WAF blocking issues to allow legitimate user access and enable full website analysis.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and trust.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to meet compliance requirements and improve user trust.
  4. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website access is blocked by Cloudflare security service with a challenge page indicating triggered security rules. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies on the landing page.
  3. No contact information or business details are exposed on the blocked page.
  4. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate registration.
  5. No technical or security headers visible due to minimal content.
  6. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected in the blocked page.
  7. No forms or data collection mechanisms visible.
  8. No social media or external business links found except Cloudflare and ICANN references.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected and hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN, DNS, and security services. The HTML content is minimal and represents a Cloudflare challenge/block page, indicating triggered security rules. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are present in the accessible content. The domain is registered with NameSilo, LLC since 2007, showing a long-term registration. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. The site lacks visible meta tags, structured data, or SEO optimizations due to blocking. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed from the blocked page.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mozzartbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mozzartbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.