Skip to main content

Security report for motoroil24.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website motoroil24.lv currently serves as a security checkpoint page implemented by BitNinja, presenting a CAPTCHA challenge to visitors. This indicates that direct access to the actual website content is blocked by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) mechanism, preventing normal browsing and content retrieval. The site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and references legacy CMS platforms such as Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 in meta tags, suggesting either outdated or placeholder content. No business-specific information, contact details, or privacy policies are present in the accessible content, limiting the ability to assess the company's market position or services. From a technical perspective, the site employs reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation but lacks visible modern security headers or explicit HTTPS enforcement in the provided HTML. The performance and mobile optimization are basic, with minimal content and poor SEO indicators. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, reflects poor privacy compliance and business credibility. Security-wise, the presence of a BitNinja CAPTCHA indicates active protection against automated abuse, but the lack of visible security headers and no WHOIS data due to query limits restricts a full security posture evaluation. The domain's legitimacy cannot be verified, and the site is effectively inaccessible without passing the CAPTCHA. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the blocking mechanism and lack of accessible information. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency by providing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers and HTTPS enforcement, and ensuring accessible business contact information to build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching motoroil24.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website being blocked by a security CAPTCHA and the absence of accessible business content, detailed business intelligence is limited. The site appears to be related to motor oil or automotive products based on the domain name, but no explicit business description, market positioning, or service offerings are available. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or contact channels. The use of legacy CMS references suggests the site may be outdated or under maintenance. No revenue streams or customer segments can be identified from the current accessible content.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's security solution with a CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated threats, indicating a proactive security measure. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. The absence of HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content is a concern, though it may be enforced at the server level (not visible here). No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the accessible content. The CAPTCHA form is the only data collection point, which is secured by Google's reCAPTCHA. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed, limiting assessment of compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with HSTS to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide accessible contact information and business details to enhance credibility.
  5. Regularly update CMS and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website is presenting a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge page blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details present
  5. Website appears to be a security gate rather than a functional business site
  6. Uses outdated CMS references (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) in meta tags, possibly legacy or placeholder
  7. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts for tracking
  8. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in provided HTML
  9. No external business or social media links found
  10. No forms other than CAPTCHA form present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and may pose security risks if still in use. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and uses Google's reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The HTML structure is minimal and primarily serves the CAPTCHA challenge, with inline CSS for styling. No modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced performance optimizations are detected. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta descriptions. Hosting provider information is not discernible from the HTML content. The site is currently inaccessible without CAPTCHA validation, limiting further technical analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with motoroil24.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review motoroil24.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.