Skip to main content

Security report for motopress.com

MotoPress · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MotoPress is a specialized WordPress plugin and theme developer focusing on booking solutions for hotels, appointments, and rental properties. Their product portfolio includes premium and free plugins such as Hotel Booking, Appointment Booking, and Gutenberg blocks, alongside Elementor addons and WordPress themes tailored for hospitality and service industries. The company targets small to midsize businesses and WordPress users seeking robust booking and website solutions. Their market position is that of a niche provider with a strong reputation evidenced by user reviews and active product demos. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Easy Digital Downloads and Yoast SEO, supported by Cloudflare DNS and enhanced with Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and a consistent, professional design. However, some accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but improvements are recommended in security headers and transparency. Overall, MotoPress presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies is a notable gap in compliance. Strategic improvements in security transparency and privacy compliance would enhance their risk posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching motopress.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MotoPress operates in the WordPress ecosystem, focusing on booking and rental solutions, which is a growing niche with steady demand. Their business model combines direct product sales and membership subscriptions, providing recurring revenue streams. The company leverages demos and user reviews to build trust and attract customers. Their partnership ecosystem includes dedicated demo and support sites, enhancing customer experience. Growth indicators include recent product updates and active blog content. The company maintains a consistent brand and targets a global audience of WordPress users and small businesses in hospitality and service sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policies or incident response contacts limit transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate tracking but no evident privacy safeguards. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better policy publication, security headers, and DNSSEC implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MotoPress
Description
MotoPress is a creator of the hotel and appointment booking plugins, Elementor templates, Gutenberg blocks, and multiple WordPress designs and tools.
Key services
Hotel Booking plugin, Appointment Booking plugin, Gutenberg blocks (Getwid), Elementor addons and templates, WordPress themes, Plugin configuration and support services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.20, Easy Digital Downloads v2.9.19, Yoast SEO plugin v13.4.1, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Zendesk Web Widget
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Zendesk Chat Widget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich with detailed product offerings and demos
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main site
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found
  5. Strong branding and consistent design
  6. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable WordPress platform with well-known plugins for e-commerce and SEO. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Analytics and marketing integrations are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, enhancing availability and performance. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich search results. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and accessibility enhancements. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with motopress.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review motopress.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.