Skip to main content

Security report for motionlegal.lv

Motion · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Motion is a specialized law firm based in Latvia focusing on dispute resolution, arbitration, and corporate legal services. The firm targets a diverse clientele including companies, public authorities, financial institutions, and private individuals. Their website presents a professional image with detailed service descriptions and a clear team structure. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies and multilingual support via Weglot. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust verification, but the site content and structure indicate a legitimate business. Overall, the website is well-designed and functional, though improvements in privacy and security policies are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching motionlegal.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in a niche legal market with a focus on dispute resolution and cross-border legal matters. Their business model revolves around providing expert legal advice and representation in complex disputes and transactional matters. The target market includes medium to large enterprises and public sector clients in sectors such as banking, energy, transport, technology, and healthcare. The firm emphasizes innovative and entrepreneurial legal solutions, positioning itself as a trusted advisor. The website's content quality and professional presentation support a credible market presence, though lack of visible certifications or social proof may limit competitive advantage. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. The use of third-party scripts is limited and appears safe, but the absence of analytics or tracking reduces visibility into user behavior and potential security monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie policy and explicit consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate commitment to security and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance trust signals by adding certifications, client testimonials, or social media presence to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Motion
Description
Motion is a dynamic niche law firm with a core practice in dispute resolution in courts and through various alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, including arbitration. Motion brings together attorneys who provide legal support to clients in a wide range of life situations, from complex disputes to everyday legal problems, helping clients to achieve their ambitions.
Key services
dispute resolution, arbitration, transactional drafting and negotiation, criminal defence and representation, corporate law advice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery, Weglot translation, SmoothScroll
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure email contact via mailto links

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Weglot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No cookie policy or consent mechanism found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. Privacy policy is present but basic.
  5. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found.
  6. Contact email is consistent with domain.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Website uses Weglot for multilingual support (English and Latvian).
  9. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No security headers detected in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing Google Fonts, jQuery, and Weglot for multilingual support. The hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing good performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and smooth scrolling features. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No analytics or advanced tracking tools are detected, which limits insights into user engagement. The technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with motionlegal.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review motionlegal.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.