Skip to main content

Security report for motionarium.top

Other · Russia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website motionarium.top is a personal hobby portfolio site created by an individual named Брокля from Russia, focusing on UI/UX design and website layout as a hobby. The site showcases various versions of personal projects and links to social media and code repositories. It is a small-scale, non-commercial site with no evident business operations or commercial intent. Technically, the site is a simple static HTML/CSS/JavaScript implementation hosted with DNS services via Cloudflare and registered through Dynadot LLC with privacy protection. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating minimal tracking and data collection. From a security perspective, the site does not present advanced security features such as security headers or DNSSEC, and no privacy or cookie policies are provided. The domain is privacy protected, which is appropriate for a personal hobby site. No vulnerabilities or malicious content are detected, but the security posture is basic. Overall, the site is safe and functional as a personal portfolio but lacks professional business and compliance features. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers and HTTPS enforcement, and providing contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching motionarium.top

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a personal hobby portfolio without commercial business activities. It targets a general audience interested in UI/UX design and web development. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on showcasing personal projects and social media presence. There are no revenue streams or partnerships indicated. The site is small in scale, with no parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators and market positioning are minimal, consistent with a personal hobbyist presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from Cloudflare DNS usage but not explicitly confirmed), but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No incident response or security policies are published. There is no evidence of data protection officer or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site does not collect sensitive data or use forms, reducing attack surface. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated. Overall, the security posture is minimal but adequate for a personal hobby site.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance.
  4. Provide clear contact information for user trust and potential incident response.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to demonstrate security awareness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal hobby website of an individual named Брокля from Russia, interested in UI/UX design and website layout as a hobby.
Key services
UI/UX design hobby projects, website layout examples
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal hobby portfolio with limited business information.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No analytics or advertising detected.
  6. Content is in Russian and English, targeting general audience.
  7. Website uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  8. No CMS or frameworks detected; static HTML/CSS/JS site.
  9. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  10. Domain registration uses privacy protection with US registrar Dynadot.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML/CSS/JavaScript site with no detected CMS or frameworks. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS and Dynadot registrar with privacy protection. The site loads moderately fast with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility. There is no use of analytics or advertising technologies, indicating low technical complexity and minimal tracking. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security best practices. The site could benefit from modernization in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with motionarium.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review motionarium.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.