Skip to main content

Security report for mostbet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ntcdl0i.com operates as an online sports betting platform branded as Mostbet, targeting a global audience with multiple alternate language domains. The business is newly established with domain registration in late 2024, consistent with a startup in the online gambling sector. The platform uses modern web technologies including React SPA architecture and integrates third-party marketing and analytics SDKs such as AppsFlyer and Paybetget. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure, indicating scalable cloud deployment. However, the website lacks visible user-facing content in the provided HTML snapshot, with no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies published, and no contact or security incident response information available. This absence of transparency and compliance documentation reduces trust and raises compliance concerns.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mostbet.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mostbet.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mostbet appears to be positioning itself as a global online sports betting service with localized domains for various countries and languages. The business model relies on online gambling revenue streams, likely including sports betting and possibly affiliate marketing. The lack of published business or legal information, such as company registration or VAT numbers, limits the ability to verify legitimacy. The use of multiple related domains suggests an attempt to capture diverse markets. The absence of contact details and compliance policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory acceptance in some jurisdictions.

Security posture

The security posture is weak based on available data. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details, which are critical for secure online gambling operations. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a significant gap for a business handling sensitive user data and financial transactions. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security and compliance to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement robust DNS security measures.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to ensure regulatory compliance.
  3. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities related to third-party scripts and data handling.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online sports betting platform
Key services
online sports betting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (SPA), AppsFlyer SDK, Paybetget SDK
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, AppsFlyer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AppsFlyer, Paybetget
Marketing tools
AppsFlyer SDK
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched online sports betting platform.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information or security policies published.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript SPA technology with React.
  5. Hosted on AWS infrastructure with multiple AWS DNS servers.
  6. Extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing SDKs.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  8. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in HTML.
  9. Content is minimal and mostly technical with no visible user-facing content in provided HTML.
  10. Multiple alternate language URLs suggest targeting multiple countries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based SPA framework with asynchronous JavaScript loading and integration of marketing and analytics SDKs. Hosting is on AWS, leveraging multiple AWS DNS servers for reliability. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. However, the site lacks visible content in the provided HTML snapshot, suggesting content is dynamically loaded or protected. No CMS or backend platform is identified. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The use of multiple external domains for localization is a positive for market reach but requires careful management to avoid security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mostbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mostbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.