Skip to main content

Security report for monoride.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website monoride.lv is currently inaccessible, presenting a generic error page indicating the store is unavailable with an HTTP 500 status code. No business-related content, metadata, or structured data is present, preventing any meaningful analysis of the company's operations, services, or market position. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, leaving domain registration details unknown. The lack of accessible content and domain data suggests the website may be inactive or suspended. From a technical perspective, the site lacks any detectable scripts, analytics, or modern web technologies. There is no evidence of security headers or SSL configuration details, and no privacy or cookie policies are found. The website's design is minimal and non-functional, with poor accessibility and SEO characteristics. The absence of contact information or business identifiers further reduces the site's credibility. Security posture is weak due to the unavailability of the site and missing security best practices. The domain's legitimacy cannot be verified without WHOIS data, and the site appears to be blocked or down, which is a critical issue. Overall, the risk level is high due to lack of transparency, missing security controls, and inaccessible content. Strategic recommendations include restoring website availability, implementing HTTPS with proper SSL, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing clear business and contact information, and improving technical and security configurations to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching monoride.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the unavailability of the website and absence of WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no information on market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model. The lack of contact details and business descriptions suggests the domain is either inactive or not currently used for commercial purposes. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The domain's status and usage remain unknown.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor. The website is down and returns an error page, indicating operational issues. No security headers or SSL information are available, and no privacy or incident response policies are published. The absence of contact channels for security incidents or abuse reports further weakens the security readiness. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting trust verification. Overall, the site lacks basic security hygiene and compliance indicators.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website availability and resolve server errors causing HTTP 500 status.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear business contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  5. Add security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is an error page indicating the store is unavailable with HTTP 500 status code. WHOIS query limit exceeded error also suggests limited access. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is blocked/inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently unavailable and returns an error page with status code 500.
  2. No meaningful content, metadata, or business information is present on the site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information, forms, or external links detected.
  5. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  7. No security headers or SSL information available from provided data.
  8. Website is effectively blocked or down, preventing full analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal error page with no detectable scripts, frameworks, or CMS. No metadata, Open Graph tags, or structured data are present. The HTML is basic and lacks SEO optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal but functional at a basic level. No external resources or analytics services are detected. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are unknown due to lack of data. Performance is moderate given the minimal content but overall technical implementation is poor.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with monoride.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review monoride.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.