Skip to main content

Security report for modomex.com

MB MODOMEX · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MB MODOMEX is a Lithuanian small business specializing in the preparation and administration of investment projects, primarily assisting clients in securing financial support including EU funding. The company presents itself as experienced and collaborative, targeting businesses seeking project financing solutions. The website is built on WordPress, utilizing common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, with moderate technical maturity and basic mobile optimization. However, the absence of HTTPS is a critical security flaw, exposing users to potential risks. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Contact options are limited to a contact form and social media links, with no direct email or phone contacts visible. Overall, the business appears legitimate but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching modomex.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention modomex.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for modomex.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche consulting sector focused on investment project management and financial support facilitation. Its market position is supported by a portfolio of clients displayed on the website, indicating established partnerships. The business model revolves around service provision to other businesses, primarily in Lithuania. The website content and structure suggest a professional approach, though the lack of detailed corporate information such as founding year or registration details limits full assessment. The use of common WordPress plugins and Google Analytics indicates standard digital marketing practices. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving transparency and security posture.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level due to the absence of HTTPS, outdated JavaScript libraries, and lack of security headers. No evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism was found. The contact form uses validation but no advanced protections like CAPTCHA or anti-spam beyond basic measures. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the business to compliance risks under GDPR. The security score is low, and immediate remediation is recommended to protect user data and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance contact forms with anti-spam measures and consider adding direct contact information for transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MB MODOMEX
Description
MB MODOMEX is a team of competent specialists with many years of experience focused on preparing and coordinating business investment projects. They assist clients in obtaining financial resources through various financial mechanisms and collaborate with key institutions administering funding.
Key services
Project preparation, Project administration, Financial support consulting, Collaboration with funding institutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.0, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Flexslider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of contact form with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully loaded with rich content.
  2. No HTTPS detected, which is a critical security issue.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or registrant info extracted.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  5. Contact information primarily via contact form and social media links; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7.
  7. Google Analytics used for tracking; no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. Client logos displayed indicating established business relationships.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
  10. Site disables right-click context menu, possibly to deter content copying.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress CMS with plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization and Contact Form 7 for user inquiries. The front-end uses jQuery 1.9.0 and Flexslider for UI components. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical and security deficiency. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile beyond basic responsive design. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin and meta tags but could be improved with structured data expansion and better content policies. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with modomex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review modomex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.