Skip to main content

Security report for modland.top

Other · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website modland.top is currently inaccessible due to an invalid SSL certificate on the origin server, resulting in a Cloudflare Error 526 page. This prevents any meaningful content or business information from being displayed. The domain is very recently registered in June 2024 and uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, which limits transparency and trust. No privacy policies, contact information, or business details are present on the site. Technically, the site relies on Cloudflare for CDN and security but fails to provide a valid SSL certificate, severely impacting security posture and user trust. Overall, the website is not operational in a meaningful way and scores very low on content quality, security, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching modland.top

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention modland.top, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for modland.top right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, no clear market positioning, business model, or target audience can be determined. The domain's recent creation and privacy-protected registration suggest a new or possibly inactive venture. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The absence of contact details and policies further indicates a lack of established business operations or transparency.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, primarily due to the invalid SSL certificate causing Cloudflare to block access with an Error 526. No security headers or best practices are observed. DNSSEC is not enabled, and the domain uses privacy protection, which is common but reduces trust. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and implementation of standard security controls are necessary.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL certificate on the origin server to restore secure access.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Publish privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service to improve compliance and transparency.
  4. Add clear contact information and business details to establish credibility.
  5. Implement security headers and conduct regular security audits to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The website is showing a Cloudflare Error 526 page indicating an invalid SSL certificate on the origin server, blocking normal content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to invalid SSL certificate (Cloudflare Error 526).
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found.
  3. No contact information or business details available on the site.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Minimal external links only to Cloudflare domains related to error information.
  6. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected.
  7. Website is not SEO optimized and lacks accessibility features.
  8. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and very recent domain registration.
  9. Overall website quality and professionalism are poor.
  10. Security posture is weak due to SSL issues and lack of security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a CDN and security provider but currently fails due to an invalid SSL certificate on the origin server. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks SEO meta tags beyond basic charset and viewport settings. Performance is poor as the site is inaccessible. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal due to the error page. No analytics or tracking scripts are present. The domain is hosted via NameSilo, LLC with Cloudflare nameservers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is minimal and incomplete.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with modland.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review modland.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.