Skip to main content

Security report for mobilissport.hu

Other · Hungary

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobilis Sport's website functions primarily as a login portal for users, likely members or customers of a sports-related service based in Hungary. The site provides minimal public-facing content beyond the login form and basic cookie usage disclosure. The business appears to be small and relatively young, founded around 2020, with no detailed business description or contact information available on the site. The technical infrastructure uses common open-source libraries such as AngularJS, jQuery, and AdminLTE for UI styling, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity but with room for modernization and improvement in SEO and accessibility. From a security perspective, the site employs basic best practices such as HTTPS assumed usage and password masking on login forms. However, it lacks important security headers, CSRF protections, and a proper cookie consent mechanism, which lowers its security posture. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service are present, which raises compliance concerns especially under GDPR. The absence of contact information and business credentials further limits trust and credibility. Overall, the website is functional for its purpose but lacks comprehensive security, privacy, and business transparency features. The domain age and WHOIS data suggest a legitimate small business operation, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, privacy disclosures, and richer content to improve user trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing full GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers and CSRF protections, fixing minor JavaScript issues, and providing clear business contact information to enhance credibility and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobilissport.hu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobilis Sport appears to operate in the sports sector, providing a digital portal for user authentication likely tied to membership or service access. The business model is account-based, targeting users who require login access. Market positioning is unclear due to lack of public content, but the site likely serves a niche or local audience in Hungary. The company is small and relatively new, founded in 2020, with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not discernible from the site. The technology stack is standard for small to medium web applications, with no advanced integrations or e-commerce features. The lack of contact and legal information limits transparency and potential partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via HTTPS), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. The login form uses POST and masks password input but lacks CSRF tokens or anti-bot measures. Cookie usage is disclosed but without an explicit consent mechanism. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML but could improve by implementing modern security best practices. The absence of privacy and terms policies is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small internal portal but insufficient for higher-risk environments.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive GDPR-compliant privacy policy and make it accessible on the site.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add CSRF protection tokens to all forms, especially login forms.
  5. Fix JavaScript event handler issues to improve user experience and reduce potential errors.
  6. Provide clear business contact information and terms of service to improve trust and compliance.
  7. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities.
  8. Improve SEO and accessibility to enhance site usability and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a login portal for Mobilis Sport, likely related to sports activities or services. No explicit business description is provided on the page.
Key services
User login portal
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, AngularJS 1.6.9, Google Fonts (Source Sans Pro), Font Awesome, Ionicons
Frameworks
AdminLTE
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from provided data
  • Login form uses POST method
  • Password input field masked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie usage is disclosed in text but no explicit consent mechanism.
  4. No contact information or social media links present.
  5. Uses common open source libraries and frameworks.
  6. No advanced security headers or policies detected.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities but security posture is basic.
  8. No business or legal information disclosed on the page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of AngularJS 1.6.9, jQuery, and the AdminLTE template framework, with styling from Font Awesome and Ionicons icon sets. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads Google Tag Manager asynchronously for analytics purposes. The HTML structure is basic and functional but lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. The login form is straightforward but has a minor JavaScript onclick handler issue. Performance is likely moderate given the lightweight framework usage, but no explicit performance optimizations or hosting details are available. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design features detected. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a small login portal but could benefit from modernization and improved security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobilissport.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobilissport.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.