Skip to main content

Security report for moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr

OPPBTP (Organisme Professionnel de Prévention du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics) · Other · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr is a professionally designed portal focused on construction risk prevention targeted at maîtres d’ouvrage in France. It is operated under the umbrella of OPPBTP, a recognized professional prevention organization in the construction sector. The site provides educational content, tools, and resources to optimize construction project safety and performance. The domain registration is consistent with the business purpose and shows no suspicious patterns, indicating legitimacy. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Matomo analytics, and Axeptio for cookie consent, hosted on a reputable registrar (Gandi). The CMS appears to be Ibexa, a professional content management system. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO and accessibility basics, although some security headers are missing. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is good with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism in place. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its target audience, but could enhance security transparency and technical security controls to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche of construction safety and risk prevention, serving primarily French construction project owners and stakeholders. It leverages partnerships with recognized institutions such as CNAM and CNRACL, enhancing its credibility and reach. The business model is informational and service-oriented, focusing on prevention advice, tools, and educational content. The domain age and registration details align well with the business timeline, supporting authenticity. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The site content and structure support a medium-sized organization with a clear focus on safety in construction.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and consent tools, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OPPBTP (Organisme Professionnel de Prévention du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics)
Description
Maître d’ouvrage, optimisez la performance de vos opérations de construction en agissant en prévention des risques professionnels
Key services
Prevention advice, Tools and solutions for risk prevention, Information resources, Partnerships with construction stakeholders
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Axeptio Cookie Consent, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Axeptio
Marketing tools
Matomo, Axeptio
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on construction risk prevention targeting maîtres d’ouvrage in France.
  3. Use of professional analytics and cookie consent tools indicates compliance awareness.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on the main page; contact is via external contact page.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Good use of Open Graph metadata for social sharing.
  8. No JSON-LD structured data detected in the HTML content.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  10. Logo is present in the navigation area with alt text 'PréventionBTP un service OPPBTP'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS (Ibexa) and uses standard web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics and Axeptio for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature approach to user tracking and privacy compliance. Hosting is managed via Gandi, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading images that have fallback errors, suggesting minor optimization opportunities. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No JSON-LD structured data was found, which could be added to improve SEO further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moa-batissez-en-prevention.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.