Security report for mmr.cz
Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR · Government · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.
The website represents the official online presence of the Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic (Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR). It serves as a central government portal providing information on regional policy, housing, urban planning, construction law, investment policy, tourism, public auctions, real estate activities, and funeral services. The ministry was established in 1996 and plays a significant role in managing public funds and regulatory oversight in these sectors. The site targets Czech citizens, government officials, municipalities, and businesses involved in housing and regional development. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms and likely uses Kentico CMS, with modern web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a structured navigation experience. However, some security best practices like security headers are missing, and privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found in the provided content. User tracking is implemented via Facebook Pixels, with Google Analytics scripts present but commented out. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating basic security hygiene. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for government domains under CZ NIC registry policies and does not detract significantly from trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its governmental function effectively. Recommendations include implementing explicit privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers to enhance protection, and regularly auditing third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 25/ 100 · Critical
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- Critical
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
- CWE-319
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V3.4.1
- RFC 6797 §6.1.1
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: hsts_min_age 63072000
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(a): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(a): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching mmr.cz
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 85
- Security headers
- 55
- Email security
- 65
- DNS health
- 70
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 25
- Average
- 67
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
- Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
- Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
- Publish security policies and incident response procedures to enhance transparency and trust.
- Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR
- Description
- Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR (MMR) patří do systému ústředních orgánů státní správy České republiky v oblastech, vymezených příslušnými právními dokumenty. Objemem svých pravomocí, kompetencí a odpovědností za správu finančních prostředků hraje ve státní správě významnou roli. Ministerstvo bylo zřízeno s účinností od 1. listopadu 1996 a je ústředním orgánem státní správy ve věcech: regionální politiky, politiky bydlení, rozvoje domovního a bytového fondu, nájmu bytů a nebytových prostor, územního plánování, stavebního řádu, vyvlastnění, investiční politiky, cestovního ruchu, veřejné dražby a realitní činnosti, pohřebnictví.
- Key services
- regionální politika, politika bydlení, rozvoj domovního a bytového fondu, nájem bytů a nebytových prostor, územní plánování, stavební řád, vyvlastnění, investiční politika, cestovní ruch, veřejné dražby
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- ASP.NET WebForms, JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts (Roboto), Chart.js
- Frameworks
- ASP.NET
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 70/100
- Good practices seen
- Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
- CSRF token present in form
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics (commented out), Facebook Pixel
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- basic
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel (two IDs detected)
- Marketing tools
- Google Analytics (commented out), Facebook Pixel
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Official Czech government ministry website with comprehensive content about regional development and housing policies.
- No WHOIS data available, likely due to registry policy or privacy.
- Website uses ASP.NET WebForms and Kentico CMS.
- No explicit privacy or cookie policies detected in the provided content.
- Multiple Facebook Pixels detected, indicating user tracking for marketing or analytics.
- No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for enhanced security.
- Website content is in Czech language with English language option available.
- No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
- Website includes a calendar of ministry events with detailed listings.
- No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 68/100Medium25 findings · partial scanView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with mmr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmr.cz.