Skip to main content

Security report for mmghlinsko.cz

Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko is a municipal cultural institution based in the Czech Republic, providing museum and gallery services including exhibitions, cultural programs, and publications. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting local visitors and art enthusiasts. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration for e-commerce functionality, employing common plugins for galleries and mobile menus. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and lack of WHOIS data reduce compliance and trust scores. Security headers are not evident, and no formal vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, suggesting room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy from a content perspective but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmghlinsko.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates as a small-sized cultural entity focused on serving the Hlinsko community and visitors interested in regional art and history. Its business model revolves around exhibitions, cultural events, and sales of publications via an online shop. The website's market position is local/regional with no indication of broader commercial ambitions. Partnerships include local tourism promotion sites and the web design agency. The museum leverages digital tools for visitor engagement but lacks advanced marketing or analytics sophistication. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of current and upcoming exhibitions suggests active programming. The museum's digital presence is consistent with typical municipal cultural institutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposed sensitive data. The use of WordPress and common plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The lack of security headers and absence of documented security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but should enhance security controls and compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko
Description
Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko is a municipal museum and gallery located in Hlinsko, Czech Republic. The website provides information about the museum, its history, crafts, textile exhibits, gallery exhibitions, current and past exhibitions, publications, and visitor information including opening hours and contact details.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Gallery exhibitions, Cultural events and programs, Publications sales via e-shop, Visitor information and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Easy Fancybox, MetaSlider, Mobile Menu plugin, Koko Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Koko Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
koko-analytics
Marketing tools
Koko Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on museum and gallery information with cultural and educational emphasis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visibly present.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-shop functionality.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  10. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses jQuery and several plugins including Easy Fancybox for image galleries, MetaSlider for slideshows, and a mobile menu plugin for responsive navigation. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and integrates a custom analytics solution (Koko Analytics). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site lacks advanced technical SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and consistent design. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmghlinsko.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmghlinsko.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.