Skip to main content

Security report for mm.group

MM Group · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MM Group is a global leader in the manufacturing and supply of consumer packaging products including cartonboard, folding cartons, kraft papers, uncoated fine papers, leaflets, and labels. The company targets businesses and consumers in the packaging and paper industries, positioning itself as a large enterprise with a strong market presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mm.group

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MM Group operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on packaging solutions. The business model centers on producing and supplying various paper and packaging products globally. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics platforms to enhance marketing reach and customer insights. While no direct contact information or detailed corporate data is publicly available on the homepage, the presence of a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates a mature compliance posture. The lack of visible terms of service or security policy pages suggests areas for improvement in transparency. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for large enterprises to safeguard registrant information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements a detailed cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content, indicating potential for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing introduces a moderate tracking footprint, but the site provides user control over cookie preferences. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from explicit security headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service and security policy page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Provide visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MM Group
Description
MM is a global leader in consumer packaging, offering cartonboard, folding cartons, kraft papers, uncoated fine papers, leaflets and labels.
Key services
cartonboard, folding cartons, kraft papers, uncoated fine papers, leaflets, labels
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot, Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, limiting domain ownership transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 and uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for cookie management and GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets optimized for performance and preloads key resources. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate presence but should enhance security best practices and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mm.group. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mm.group.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.