Skip to main content

Security report for mki.lv

SIA RŪDIS 2000 · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MKI, operated by SIA RŪDIS 2000, is a Latvian small manufacturing company specializing in custom metal and wood products including fences, gates with automation, stairs, railings, canopies, and paving solutions. The company emphasizes tailored solutions and has over 30 years of experience, positioning itself as a trusted local provider for residential and commercial clients. The website is professionally designed using the Webnode CMS platform, hosted on Cloudfront CDN, and includes modern tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Google Ads. It features a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements and provides clear contact information and social media links. However, the WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-focused with moderate technical sophistication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mki.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mki.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mki.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Latvian customers seeking high-quality custom metal and wood manufacturing services. Its business model revolves around bespoke production and installation, leveraging 30 years of expertise to maintain a competitive edge. The website supports lead generation via contact forms and social media engagement. The absence of terms of service and detailed security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and customer assurance. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and analytics, indicating active digital presence. The company appears to operate independently without visible subsidiaries or partners. The clear physical address and local phone number enhance credibility. The business is positioned as a specialized niche manufacturer within the Latvian market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner with granular user controls, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. No advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are best practices for transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA RŪDIS 2000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA RŪDIS 2000
Description
Mūsu ražotnē top unikāli žogu, vārtu, margu, kāpņu un automātikas risinājumi, kas ideāli piemēroti mūsdienīgai videi. Mūsu speciālisti izstrādās un uzstādīs visu nepieciešamo, lai jūsu iekštelpa un ārtelpa kļūtu par jūsu sapņu mājvietu.
Key services
Custom fences, Gates with automation, Metal and wood stairs, Railings, Canopies, Paving solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, BFT gate automation mention
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Clear contact information and social media presence
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed options
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  5. No visible security policy or incident response info
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. Uses Webnode CMS and Cloudfront CDN
  8. Google Analytics and Ads tracking present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and served via Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable hosting and content delivery. It uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with responsive design for mobile optimization. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies visible from the front end. Accessibility is basic, and SEO metadata is present but could be improved. The technical implementation is suitable for a small business informational site but could benefit from enhancements in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mki.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mki.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.