Skip to main content

Security report for mkf.lv

Mārtiņa Koku Fabrika · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mārtiņa Koku Fabrika is a Latvian small business specializing in the manufacture and online retail of wooden products, including Latvian cultural symbols and kitchen accessories. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, supporting multilingual content in Latvian and Russian. The business targets customers interested in traditional wooden crafts and cultural items, positioning itself as a niche local manufacturer and retailer. The site features customer reviews, social media presence, and basic privacy and cookie policies, indicating a focus on trust and compliance. Technically, the site uses modern WordPress plugins and themes, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy e-commerce platform for wooden crafts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mkf.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on wooden products with cultural significance. Its business model is direct online sales via WooCommerce, targeting general consumers interested in Latvian heritage items. The presence of verified customer reviews and social media links supports customer engagement and trust. The site content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise founded around 2016. The lack of detailed contact information and WHOIS data limits deeper business verification. The company leverages SEO and multilingual capabilities to reach a broader audience. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) are detected, and no security or incident response policies are published. There is no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, which could improve transparency and incident handling. The site uses popular WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities are found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy or vulnerability disclosure page, including a security.txt file, to improve transparency and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mārtiņa Koku Fabrika
Description
Koka izstrādājumi
Key services
Manufacture and sale of wooden Latvian symbols, Sale of kitchen accessories, Online retail via WooCommerce
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual), jQuery, Photoswipe, Blocksy theme, Breeze caching plugin, Customer Reviews for WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WPML, Customer Reviews for WooCommerce
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling wooden products.
  2. Content is in Latvian with Russian alternate language available.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  5. Social media links are present but URLs are placeholders (#).
  6. Customer reviews are present with verified owners, enhancing trust.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Site uses HTTPS and modern WordPress plugins and themes.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Blocksy theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It employs several plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, Breeze for caching, and Customer Reviews for WooCommerce to manage user feedback. The site loads jQuery and Photoswipe libraries for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. No hosting provider information is directly available. The site lacks advanced security headers and some accessibility features, representing areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mkf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mkf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.