Skip to main content

Security report for mkc-horovice.cz

Městské kulturní centrum Hořovice · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městské kulturní centrum Hořovice (MKC) is a local government cultural institution based in Hořovice, Czech Republic, founded in 2009. It offers a variety of cultural services including event hosting, exhibitions, library services, and tourist information. The website serves as a portal for community engagement, event calendars, and cultural promotion, targeting local residents and tourists. MKC maintains a consistent brand presence with clear contact information and social media integration primarily via Facebook. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO, sliders, and search functionality, demonstrating a moderate to good level of digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mkc-horovice.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MKC holds a stable position as a local cultural hub, leveraging partnerships with regional organizations and event platforms like GoOut.net. Its business model focuses on public service and community enrichment rather than commercial revenue. The website supports ticket sales and event promotion, indicating some revenue streams through cultural events. The institution's ecosystem includes library services, galleries, and tourist information, reflecting a diversified cultural offering. The presence of a dedicated data protection officer contact aligns with GDPR compliance efforts. MKC's growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and enhancing accessibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public cultural website but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Městské kulturní centrum Hořovice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městské kulturní centrum Hořovice
Description
Městské kulturní centrum Hořovice provides cultural services including event hosting, exhibitions, library services, and tourist information in Hořovice.
Key services
Event calendar and ticket sales, Library services, Tourist information center, Gallery exhibitions, Cultural education and lectures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Smart Slider 3, Contact Form 7, Download Manager plugin, Ajax Search Lite, Easy Fancybox, Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural center for Hořovice with multiple services and event listings.
  2. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  3. Includes cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  4. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple channels.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. Good use of structured data for SEO and organization info.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  10. No advertising networks detected beyond Cookiebot tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.7.1 with a suite of well-known plugins including Yoast SEO, Smart Slider 3, Contact Form 7, and Ajax Search Lite, indicating a modern and extensible technical infrastructure. The site uses Google Fonts and external CDN resources for performance and aesthetics. Hosting and DNS are managed via REG-INTERNET-CZ and Forpsi name servers, consistent with Czech hosting providers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Technical risks are low but could be further mitigated by implementing security headers and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mkc-horovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mkc-horovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.