Skip to main content

Security report for mjprado.com.br

M.J.Prado · Other · Brazil

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

M.J.Prado is a specialized consulting company focused on asset management and patrimonial reorganization services primarily for Brazilian businesses across various industries such as metallurgy, chemical, telecommunications, and hospitality. The company leverages over 20 years of experience and partnerships with national and multinational firms to deliver comprehensive solutions including inventory management, asset evaluation, and financial reconciliation. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and spam protection. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, and security headers are not detected, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, but no explicit security or incident response policies are visible. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mjprado.com.br

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche consulting market providing asset and patrimonial management services to medium and large enterprises in Brazil. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive industry experience and a broad service portfolio addressing fixed asset lifecycle management. The business model is service-based consulting with direct client engagement. The website targets business clients needing asset control and financial reconciliation services. Partnerships with digital agencies indicate a focus on professional branding and digital presence. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple service offerings and social media links suggest active market engagement. The company maintains a small business profile with no parent or subsidiary companies disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect contact forms from spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR or similar regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small consulting firm but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
M.J.Prado
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
M.J.Prado
Description
A company specializing in comprehensive asset management and patrimonial reorganization services, focusing on fixed assets and immobilized assets for various industries including metallurgy, chemical, auto parts, commerce, laboratories, telecommunications, hospitality, and transportation.
Key services
Inventário de bens patrimoniais, Chapeamento de bens tangíveis, Conciliação inventário físico versus controle contábil, Análise de Notas Fiscais de aquisição do Imobilizado, Saneamento das sobras, Avaliação de bens móveis e imóveis, Determinação de Saldo de Vida Útil, Teste de recuperabilidade (Impairment Test), PPA e Ágio, CIAP, PIS e COFINS
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels including phone, email, and contact form.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA indicates some attention to analytics and spam prevention.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. Content is business-focused and relevant to asset management consulting.
  8. Social media presence is limited but includes LinkedIn and Facebook.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for spam prevention. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets locally, indicating a self-hosted approach. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mjprado.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mjprado.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.