Skip to main content

Security report for mjhire.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at www.cwplant.co.uk appears to be inaccessible or blocked, as indicated by the WHOIS lookup failure and minimal HTML content. The domain is reported by Nominet UK as invalid due to contravening naming rules, specifically containing too many parts, which suggests the domain is not properly registered or is misconfigured. Consequently, no registrant or domain status information is available. The website content is truncated and lacks substantive business, contact, or policy information. Technical infrastructure includes usage of Font Awesome icons and Google reCAPTCHA scripts, but no CMS or hosting details are discernible. Security posture cannot be assessed due to lack of accessible content and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact information or social media links are found. Overall, the site exhibits very low digital maturity and business credibility, with critical issues related to domain legitimacy and content accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mjhire.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, business intelligence is limited. The domain's invalid registration status undermines trust and legitimacy. No clear business description, market positioning, or key services are identifiable. The lack of contact details and policies further diminishes credibility. No partnerships or certifications are evident. The business sector and entity type cannot be confidently determined, though the domain name suggests a possible plant hire or equipment rental business in the UK. Without verifiable data, strategic insights are unavailable.

Security posture

Security analysis is constrained by the lack of accessible website content and metadata. No security headers or SSL configuration details are present in the provided data. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA indicates some anti-bot measures, but no further security best practices or incident response mechanisms are detected. The invalid domain registration and inaccessible content represent significant security and trust concerns. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be confirmed. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires substantial improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve domain registration issues with Nominet UK to ensure valid and compliant domain ownership.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR and user transparency requirements.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  4. Implement and verify security headers and HTTPS configuration to enhance security posture.
  5. Improve website content quality and accessibility to build business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
1393410
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS lookup failed with error indicating domain name contains too many parts; no valid WHOIS data. HTML content is truncated and minimal, no substantive content found. No privacy, cookie, or contact info detected. Likely domain or site is inaccessible or blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Font Awesome 5.15.4, Google reCAPTCHA, JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules violation.
  2. Website content is minimal or blocked; no meaningful business or contact information found.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response contacts found.
  5. No certifications or trust indicators present.
  6. External resources limited to font and script libraries from known CDNs.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. Website likely inaccessible or blocked by WAF or domain registration issues.
  9. Content safety is rated safe with no adult or explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Font Awesome 5.15.4 for icons and includes Google reCAPTCHA scripts, indicating some use of modern web technologies. However, the HTML content is truncated and minimal, suggesting incomplete or blocked content delivery. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be reliably assessed due to limited content. The lack of security headers and metadata further indicates technical immaturity. Addressing domain registration and content accessibility issues is critical to enable a full technical evaluation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mjhire.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mjhire.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.