Skip to main content

Security report for mjf.co.uk

MJF Records Management · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MJF Records Management is a UK-based company specializing in secure document storage and records management services. The company emphasizes security, leveraging state-of-the-art cloud technology and secure physical facilities owned freehold. With over 85 years of family ownership and experience, MJF positions itself as one of the largest independent service providers in the UK records management sector, targeting businesses requiring secure and efficient document handling. Their key services include project management, corrective data capture measures, and cost-saving solutions, supported by a secure client portal and fast delivery options. Technically, the website uses a moderate modern technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, FancyBox, and the SeeCMS platform. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and professional design, though some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is strong in terms of certifications (ISO 27001, PCI DSS) and physical security, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found, and no cookie consent mechanism. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable and indicates the domain name is invalid per Nominet UK rules, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website content. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is professional and credible in content and business presentation but should address privacy compliance gaps and clarify domain registration legitimacy to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mjf.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mjf.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mjf.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MJF Records Management operates in the records management and secure document storage sector, serving primarily UK-based businesses and organizations. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing family ownership, large-scale independent status, and investment in secure facilities and cloud technology. The business model focuses on service delivery tailored to client needs, emphasizing security, fast retrieval, and cost efficiency. Revenue streams likely include storage fees, project management, scanning services, and data capture. The company maintains partnerships with technology providers and design agencies, as evidenced by linked domains. Growth indicators include investment in new mega centers and technology platforms. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining high security standards and expanding digital service offerings to meet hybrid work demands.

Security posture

MJF Records Management demonstrates a mature security posture with multiple ISO certifications (27001, 9001, 45001, 14001) and PCI DSS compliance, indicating strong governance and operational security. Physical security is robust with 24/7 monitoring, gas-suppressed vaults, and vetted staff. The use of a secure cloud platform for client access further enhances data protection. However, the website lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for transparency and rapid response. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, potentially exposing the company to GDPR risks. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration inconsistencies also pose reputational risks. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and web security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve domain registration inconsistencies with Nominet UK to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MJF Records Management
Description
Provides secure document storage and records management services, focusing on security, cloud technology, and client partnership.
Key services
Project Management, Corrective Measures, Saving Money, Secure document storage, Scan on demand, Fast retrieval, Secure delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, FancyBox, FontAwesome, Modernizr, SeeCMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • Secure client portal
  • Staff DBS checks
  • ISO 27001 compliance
  • Physical security measures described

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
doubleclick
Marketing tools
doubleclick
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found, though privacy is mentioned in contact form.
  3. Contact form collects name, email, phone, and message with anti-spam hidden field.
  4. No social media links explicitly present in HTML content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS indicates moderate digital maturity.
  6. Strong emphasis on security certifications and physical security measures.
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  9. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, potential GDPR compliance gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the SeeCMS platform and utilizes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, FancyBox, and Modernizr, indicating a moderately modern tech stack. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets with versioning, suggesting active maintenance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive images and viewport settings. However, SEO metadata is incomplete (missing descriptions and keywords), and accessibility features are basic. No hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics available. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms but is functional and professionally designed. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mjf.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mjf.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.