Skip to main content

Security report for mjd.lv

SIA MJD · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA MJD is a Latvian-based small technology company specializing in tailored Microsoft 365 solutions aimed at improving productivity, automation, and business process transparency. Their services include Microsoft 365 environment setup, custom Microsoft Teams applications, Power Platform low-code business apps, automation with Power Automate and AI, SharePoint customization, data migration, integration, and UX/UI design. The company positions itself as a niche provider focused on modern cloud collaboration and business automation solutions for teams and organizations leveraging Microsoft 365. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Material-UI, hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers and formal security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a specialized Microsoft 365 development company. The risk profile is low with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and cookie consent would further strengthen their security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mjd.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mjd.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mjd.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MJD operates in the technology sector focusing exclusively on Microsoft 365 solutions, targeting businesses and teams seeking to enhance productivity and automate workflows. Their competitive advantage lies in deep expertise in Microsoft cloud services and custom app development, positioning them well in the Latvian market niche. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting, custom software development, and ongoing support services. The company maintains a small team with visible LinkedIn profiles, indicating transparency and professional networking. Growth indicators include a modern website and active digital presence. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but likely includes Microsoft and related technology providers.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive information, which are foundational security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a gap. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. Overall, the security culture appears basic but can be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against attacks.
  2. Add a formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy page with dedicated contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance and user privacy control.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish terms of service to clarify legal responsibilities and user agreements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA MJD
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA MJD
Description
Pielāgoti Microsoft 365 risinājumi, kas uzlabo produktivitāti, automatizāciju un ikdienas pārskatāmību. MJD koncentrējas uz Microsoft 365 risinājumu izstrādi, mākoņpakalpojumu iestatīšanu, automatizāciju, pielāgotām lietotnēm un integrācijām, palīdzot komandām samazināt manuālo darbu un uzturēt savas sistēmas pārvaldāmas.
Key services
Microsoft 365 environment setup, Microsoft Teams custom solutions, Power Platform low-code apps, Automation with Power Automate and AI, SharePoint customization, Data migration and integration, UX/UI design and prototyping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (inferred from JSX and component structure), Material-UI (Mui components), Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Azure DNS hosting
Frameworks
React, Material-UI
Platforms
Microsoft 365 (target platform for services)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on Microsoft 365 development and consulting services.
  3. Clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address is provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policies.
  6. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  7. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with Material-UI components, ensuring a responsive and visually consistent user interface. Hosting on Azure DNS indicates reliable infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, enabling flexible data collection. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mjd.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mjd.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.