Skip to main content

Security report for mixpanel.com

Mixpanel · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mixpanel is a mature enterprise-level SaaS company specializing in product analytics and event tracking to help businesses understand user behavior and drive growth. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on the Framer platform, integrating multiple advanced analytics and marketing technologies such as Mixpanel's own analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and various advertising pixels. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited based on the provided content, lacking explicit privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in the technology analytics market, but could enhance transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mixpanel.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mixpanel operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses and product teams requiring deep insights into customer behavior. Their SaaS business model focuses on digital analytics and event tracking services, positioning them as a leading product analytics provider. The company has a long-established domain since 2007, indicating stability and market presence. The website's use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools suggests a sophisticated marketing ecosystem. However, no direct contact information or detailed corporate disclosures were found in the analyzed content, which could be improved to enhance business credibility and customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers in the provided data represent minor security gaps. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mixpanel
Description
Get a complete view of your customers with Mixpanel digital analytics. Track, analyze, and act on user behavior to drive acquisition, growth, and retention.
Key services
Product analytics, Event tracking, User behavior analysis
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Mixpanel analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Framer (website builder)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses modern fonts and a professional design framework (Framer).
  6. Domain is well-established and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  9. No certifications or compliance badges detected in the content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and a responsive design. It integrates a broad set of analytics and marketing technologies including Mixpanel's own analytics library, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and multiple advertising pixels from Facebook, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Bing. Hosting appears to be on Google Cloud infrastructure, indicated by the Google Cloud DNS nameservers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS other than Framer was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy-focused improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100 −1Low22 findingsView report
  2. 86/100 +3Low19 findingsView report
  3. 83/100Low15 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mixpanel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mixpanel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.