Skip to main content

Security report for mixed-reality.io

Mixed Reality I/O · Technology · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mixed Reality I/O operates a professional and content-rich website focused on augmented reality, virtual reality, 3D modeling, and AI consulting and development services. The company targets businesses seeking spatial computing strategies and innovative digital experiences. Their market position is supported by a history dating back to 2008, international experience, and notable client partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem, supporting multilingual content and interactive 3D models. However, the absence of HTTPS and proper SSL configuration represents a critical security vulnerability, exposing users to risks and undermining trust. Privacy compliance is addressed with cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy, but incident response and security policies are not evident. Overall, the website demonstrates strong business credibility and user experience but requires urgent security improvements to meet industry standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mixed-reality.io

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a consulting and service-based business model focusing on AR, VR, AI, and 3D design, serving a niche technology market. Their offerings include strategy consulting, software development, masterclasses, and conversational AI solutions. The presence of client testimonials and partner logos indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem and market trust. The business appears small-sized but well-established with a clear target audience of enterprises and organizations interested in immersive technologies. The multilingual support and active social media presence suggest a strategy for international reach and engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and SSL certificate, absence of security headers, and no advanced TLS protocols enabled. While no immediate vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the missing encryption exposes data in transit to interception. The website uses secure forms with anti-spam honeypot fields but lacks explicit incident response or security policy disclosures. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies. The security score is low, and the site is at risk of losing user trust and facing compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Install a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly update all software components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS with PHP 7.4 and Apache server. It uses popular plugins like Gravity Forms for contact forms, Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and Gutenslider for sliders. The site integrates interactive 3D models via model-viewer and uses jQuery and Google Fonts. Performance metrics indicate slow loading, possibly due to lack of caching or optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and ARIA landmarks. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS records suggest a commercial DNS provider. Technical debt is moderate, with room for improvement in SSL and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mixed-reality.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mixed-reality.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.