Skip to main content

Security report for mitchi.cz

Jaroslav Mitchi Mičan · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mitchi.cz represents a small Czech-based business operated by Jaroslav Mitchi Mičan, specializing in WordPress development and web design services. The site serves as a portfolio and informational platform showcasing past projects and services offered. The business targets a general audience seeking professional website creation and WordPress expertise within the Czech Republic. The market position is that of a small local service provider with a consistent and professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and utilizes common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and a cookie consent solution from CookieYes. The site demonstrates basic to moderate performance and SEO optimization, with a functional cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. Mobile optimization and accessibility are present but could be improved for a more modern user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by URLs) but lacks visible security headers in the HTML content. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The cookie consent implementation is a positive indicator of privacy awareness, though the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, clearer privacy documentation, and verified domain registration information to improve trust and compliance. The risk level is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected but with room for improvement in governance and technical security controls.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mitchi.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale WordPress and web design service provider in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized service and a portfolio showcasing diverse client projects. Revenue streams likely derive from custom website development and maintenance contracts. The target customers are local businesses and individuals seeking professional web presence. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and integration of modern tracking tools. The partnership ecosystem is limited, with no explicit partner domains identified. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital marketing and formalizing compliance documentation to enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity is basic to moderate. The site employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, limiting readiness for security events. Compliance with GDPR is partial, mainly through cookie consent but missing full privacy policy disclosure. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the absence of WHOIS data and security documentation are notable gaps. Enhancing security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response contacts would improve posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaroslav Mitchi Mičan
Description
WordPress, tvorba webových stránek
Key services
WordPress development, web design, website creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent, SEO Framework plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business portfolio for a WordPress/web design professional.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  6. Uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Website content is in Czech language targeting local audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a theme named Galleria and uses jQuery for client-side scripting. Google Tag Manager and CookieYes scripts are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management respectively. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for organization and website schema. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not disclosed in the content. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by modernizing front-end frameworks and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mitchi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mitchi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.