Skip to main content

Security report for misters-logs.lv

SIA Misters-logs · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Misters-logs is a small Latvian company specializing in the repair and modernization of PVC, wooden, and aluminum windows primarily serving the Riga area. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings including window regulation, furniture repair, glass replacement, and insulation. The company targets residential customers seeking local window maintenance and installation services. Technically, the website uses modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery, along with analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers suggest room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is functional, well-structured, and provides sufficient contact information, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching misters-logs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche local market providing window repair and related services in Riga, Latvia. Their business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and customer convenience, including on-site visits and consultations. The presence of a partner backlink site indicates some level of local business networking. The company leverages social media (Facebook) for outreach but lacks broader digital marketing or affiliate programs. Revenue streams likely come from direct service contracts and accessory sales. The website content and structure suggest a stable small business with consistent branding and a focus on customer trust through clear contact details and service descriptions.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which increases the attack surface. No explicit security headers were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of forms reduces risk exposure, but the site should implement security headers and privacy notices to improve its security maturity. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct performance optimization for better user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Misters-logs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Misters-logs
Description
Misters-logs is a professional team offering all types of PVC (plastic or package), aluminum, and wooden window repair and modernization services in Riga. The company aims to provide warmth and comfort to customers' homes by servicing various window constructions with expertise in European-known window profiles.
Key services
Window regulation, Furniture repair and replacement, Glass and glass package replacement, Sealing gasket replacement, Window insulation, Window installation, Window waxing, Window modernization, Preventive maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Lightbox2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical and base href URLs with https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and analytics scripts without visible privacy compliance.
  6. No forms detected that collect user data.
  7. Business appears to be a small local window repair service in Riga, Latvia.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS URLs used.
  9. No certifications or security policies disclosed.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Lightbox2 for image galleries. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance appears moderate with no major issues detected. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security areas. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with misters-logs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review misters-logs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.