Skip to main content

Security report for missav.ws

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MissAV is an adult entertainment website specializing in streaming high-definition Japanese adult videos (JAV) with multilingual support including English, Chinese, Japanese, and others. The platform offers free access to a large library of over 100,000 videos with daily updates and optional VIP membership upgrades. The website targets adult viewers interested in Japanese AV content and positions itself as a niche player in the adult streaming market. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Alpine.js for reactive UI, lazy loading for performance optimization, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection, but the absence of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS registration, which is common in adult content sites but reduces transparency. Overall, the site provides a good user experience and content relevance but lacks in privacy compliance and explicit business credibility disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching missav.ws

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MissAV operates a free-to-access adult video streaming service with a business model likely based on advertising and VIP subscriptions. The site leverages a recommendation engine (Recombee) to personalize content for users. Its multilingual approach and extensive video catalog suggest a strategy to capture a broad international audience interested in Japanese adult content. The presence of multiple external affiliate links and partner sites indicates an ecosystem of related adult entertainment services. However, the lack of visible company information, privacy policies, and terms of service may hinder trust and regulatory compliance. The site appears to be medium-sized with a focus on content delivery rather than corporate transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect user forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS registration is typical for adult sites but limits trust. The site lacks published incident response or security policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers and publishing privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  3. Add terms of service and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and external links for security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Best Japan AV porn site, free forever, high speed, no lag, over 100,000 videos, daily update, no ads while playing video.
Key services
Streaming HD JAV videos, English and Chinese subtitles, VIP membership for enhanced features
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Alpine.js, Axios, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Lozad.js (lazy loading), Recombee (recommendation engine)
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Input validation and error handling in login/register/forget password forms
  • Blocked keywords filtering in search and content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA, Recombee recommendation engine
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult content streaming platform specializing in Japanese AV videos
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Multiple language support with hreflang tags for international audience
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and lazy loading for performance
  5. Presence of multiple external affiliate or partner links, some with shortened URLs
  6. No explicit company contact information or business registration details found
  7. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA but lack visible security headers
  8. User account management forms present with client-side validation and recaptcha integration
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Alpine.js for reactive components and Axios for HTTP requests. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Lazy loading of images and videos is implemented via Lozad.js to improve performance. The site supports multiple languages via hreflang tags and localized URLs. The presence of a recommendation engine (Recombee) indicates advanced personalization capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and SEO metadata completeness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but lacks some security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with missav.ws. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review missav.ws.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.