Skip to main content

Security report for misiunas.lt

Advokatų kontora "Misiūnas ir partneriai" · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokatų kontora "Misiūnas ir partneriai" is a Lithuanian law firm specializing in various legal fields including criminal, labor, civil, and administrative law. The firm targets individuals and businesses in Lithuania seeking professional legal services. The website presents a professional but basic digital presence with multilingual support and community engagement through news and pro bono activities. Technically, the site is built on an outdated WordPress platform with older plugins, lacking HTTPS and modern security measures, which poses risks to data security and user trust. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website provides essential contact information and legal service descriptions but requires significant improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching misiunas.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates as a small-sized legal service provider in Lithuania, focusing on core legal sectors. Its market position appears stable locally with community involvement and pro bono work enhancing reputation. The business model is traditional legal consultancy and representation. The website content is relevant and targeted but lacks modern digital marketing and compliance features. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal online presence and outdated technology stack.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, outdated WordPress core and plugins, and lack of security headers. No incident response or security policies are visible. The contact form uses basic validation but no advanced protections like CAPTCHA or anti-spam measures are evident. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the firm to compliance risks. Immediate remediation is needed to secure communications and protect client data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest stable versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advokatų kontora "Misiūnas ir partneriai"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokatų kontora "Misiūnas ir partneriai"
Description
Lithuanian law firm providing legal services in criminal, labor, civil, and administrative law.
Key services
Legal representation, Legal consultation, Criminal law, Labor law, Civil law, Administrative law
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Contact Form 7, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of contact form with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  4. Site uses outdated WordPress and plugins, which may pose security risks.
  5. No HTTPS detected; all URLs use HTTP which is a critical security issue.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Site content is primarily in Lithuanian with language switcher for English and Russian.
  9. Site branding is moderate but consistent with a professional law firm.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) metadata found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.4.33 with Contact Form 7 plugin version 4.3.1 and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery loaded from external CDN and Google Fonts. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, indicating outdated hosting or configuration. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No modern frameworks or advanced SEO techniques detected. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but limited technical sophistication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with misiunas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review misiunas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.