Skip to main content

Security report for miniorange.com

miniOrange · Technology · India

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

miniOrange is a technology company specializing in identity and access management (IAM) solutions, offering a comprehensive suite of products including Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), User Lifecycle Management (ULM), Privileged Access Management (PAM), and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB). The company targets enterprises and IT professionals seeking secure and unified access management across cloud, web, and legacy applications. Their market position is solidified by a broad product portfolio and extensive integrations with popular platforms such as WordPress, Atlassian, Shopify, and more. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure utilizing modern technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cloudflare services. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features good SEO practices, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances search engine understanding and visibility. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, and uses Cloudflare Bot Management cookies. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly present and should be implemented to strengthen security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, providing a positive user experience. The main concern lies in the absence of publicly available WHOIS domain registration data, which affects domain legitimacy verification. Despite this, the business presence, SSL configuration, and operational indicators suggest a legitimate and established entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miniorange.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

miniOrange operates in the competitive IAM market, focusing on providing secure access solutions to enterprises. Their business model revolves around software licensing, SaaS offerings, and plugin marketplaces targeting various CMS and enterprise platforms. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Atlassian and WordPress to expand reach. Revenue streams likely include subscription services, enterprise licensing, and professional support. The target customers are medium to large enterprises requiring robust identity management. Growth indicators include a diverse product portfolio and active social media presence. Strategic partnerships with login.xecurify.com and plugin hosting domains enhance their ecosystem and service delivery.

Security posture

The security maturity of miniOrange's website is good, with HTTPS enforced and bot protection mechanisms in place. The presence of Cloudflare and Google reCAPTCHA indicates proactive defense against automated threats. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited in certain attack vectors like clickjacking or MIME sniffing. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be improved to demonstrate transparency and readiness. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR through cookie consent and privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is solid but can be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid introducing vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is publicly available or clearly justified if privacy protected.
  5. Maintain and improve GDPR compliance by periodically reviewing cookie consent mechanisms and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
miniOrange
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
miniOrange
Description
miniOrange Security Software: Unified IAM, SSO, MFA, PAM, and CASB Solution.
Key services
Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), User Lifecycle Management (ULM), Privileged Access Management (PAM), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Plugins for CMS and marketplaces
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics, Cloudflare (implied by cookies), CookieYes Consent Management, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, Bootstrap CSS, Google Custom Search Engine
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cloudflare Bot Management cookies present
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Active Campaign, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Active Campaign, Leadfeeder, Segment
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on identity and access management products and services
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. Multiple integrations and plugins offered for popular platforms
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap CSS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cloudflare services. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Active Campaign, and Segment, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit but Cloudflare presence suggests CDN and security services. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security reviews.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miniorange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miniorange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.