Skip to main content

Security report for milk.com.gr

Milk Branding Professionals · Other · Greece

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Milk Branding Professionals is a well-established branding agency based in Greece with over 20 years of experience. The company specializes in brand development, strategy, and creative projects, serving a diverse clientele including major international and local brands. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive branding solutions. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Jetboost, and Google Analytics, hosted on Webflow's platform, providing a responsive and visually appealing user experience. However, some technical improvements could enhance performance and security. Security posture is moderate; while the site uses cookie consent mechanisms and disables right-click on images, it lacks important security headers and has Google Analytics configured without IP anonymization, which may affect GDPR compliance. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no terms of service page is found. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices to align with best standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching milk.com.gr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a specialized branding consultancy with a clear focus on delivering meaningful brand experiences. Their portfolio includes notable clients such as Nestlé, Adidas, and Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company, indicating a high level of trust and industry recognition. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on creative branding projects and strategic brand development. The target customers are businesses in Greece and abroad seeking expert branding services. The company demonstrates growth and maturity with a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The website content and client logos serve as trust signals, supporting credibility and professionalism.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. It implements a cookie consent banner with an opt-out mechanism, which is positive for privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. Google Analytics is used without IP anonymization, potentially exposing user data and impacting GDPR compliance. No visible forms on the homepage reduce attack surface, but no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency. The disabling of right-click on images is a minor protective measure against content copying. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, privacy improvements, and published security policies to improve its security posture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable IP anonymization in Google Analytics to enhance user privacy and GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  5. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve features to ensure compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Milk Branding Professionals
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Milk Branding Professionals
Description
Milk Branding Professionals is a branding agency with 20 years of experience, focused on advancing branding in Greece and abroad. They help brands deliver their promise through carefully designed experiences and have a portfolio of notable clients.
Key services
Branding, Brand development, Brand strategy, Creative projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow, Jetboost, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieConsent.js
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-out mechanism
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP disabled (privacy concern)
  • Right-click disabled on images

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Jetboost
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Cookie consent implemented with opt-out mechanism.
  3. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram.
  7. Uses Webflow CMS and hosting platform.
  8. Google Analytics used without IP anonymization, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. No visible forms collecting user data on the homepage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's CDN, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Jetboost for enhanced interactivity. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and tracking purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The use of multiple external CDNs and scripts is standard but should be monitored for security. No major technical debt is evident, but the lack of security headers and privacy best practices indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with milk.com.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review milk.com.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.