Skip to main content

Security report for mikrotik.com

MikroTik · Technology · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MikroTik is a well-established technology company specializing in networking hardware and software solutions, serving a global market including ISPs, enterprises, and network professionals. Their product portfolio includes routers, switches, wireless devices, and RouterOS software, complemented by official training and certification programs. The company has a strong market presence and a consistent brand identity, supported by a long domain history dating back to 1999. Technically, the website employs a modern responsive design using Foundation 5 framework and jQuery, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site is accessible without any WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating stable hosting and infrastructure. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit GDPR compliance in its privacy policy. No cookie consent mechanism or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which are areas for improvement. Contact information is limited to an email address and social media links, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and functional with a good balance of content and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices would further strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikrotik.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mikrotik.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
42,460
Employees
0
Customers
42,396
Third parties
64
Weak passwords
14%

43 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mikrotik.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MikroTik operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, manufacturing and selling networking hardware and software globally. Their business model includes product sales, training, and support services. The company targets network engineers, ISPs, and enterprises requiring reliable networking solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product catalog, recognized training programs, and a strong global distribution network. The company shows growth indicators through active training schedules and continuous product updates. Partnerships with regional training centers and distributors enhance their market reach. The website content and domain age reflect a mature and credible business operation.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms indicates gaps in security best practices and privacy compliance. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file reduces the ability to manage security risks proactively. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements to align with modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MikroTik
Description
MikroTik makes networking hardware and software, which is used in nearly all countries of the world. Their mission is to make existing Internet technologies faster, more powerful and affordable to a wider range of users.
Key services
Networking hardware manufacturing, RouterOS software development, Training and certification, Technical support, Distribution network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.3, Foundation 5, Modernizr, LazyLoad, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Frameworks
Foundation 5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. No explicit cookie consent or terms of service found.
  4. Privacy policy is present but basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. Contact information is limited to email and social media links; no phone or physical address found.
  7. Technical stack uses older jQuery version but modern Foundation framework.
  8. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
  10. Social media presence is strong with links to X (Twitter), Facebook, Mastodon, and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable and moderately modern technology stack including Foundation 5 and jQuery 2.1.3, with additional libraries for lazy loading and cookie management. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the domain registrar is a reputable entity. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt is minimal but updating jQuery and enhancing security headers would modernize the infrastructure and reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikrotik.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikrotik.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.