Skip to main content

Security report for mikmak.tv

MikMak · Other · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MikMak appears to be a business leveraging HubSpot CMS and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Ketch for consent management. The website content is minimal with empty meta descriptions and titles, indicating either an under-construction site or a placeholder. There is no visible privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information, which limits user trust and compliance transparency. The technical infrastructure includes modern marketing and tracking technologies but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable or indicates the domain is unregistered, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity but lacks critical compliance and business credibility elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikmak.tv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company MikMak is positioned as a marketing or analytics service provider, likely targeting businesses interested in consumer engagement or advertising analytics. The use of HubSpot and multiple tracking services suggests a focus on digital marketing. However, the absence of detailed business information, contact details, and legal disclosures limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The domain's unclear registration status further complicates trust and credibility assessments. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. The site uses consent management tools, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance. However, the lack of privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts are significant gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information is a critical risk factor. Overall, the site requires improvements in transparency, security best practices, and compliance documentation to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance website content quality and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MikMak
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HubSpot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Ketch Consent Management, Qualified Chat, Microsoft Clarity, Pardot, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • Consent management implemented via Ketch
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Pardot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Pardot
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Qualified
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Ketch Consent Management, Qualified Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HubSpot CMS and marketing tools extensively.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Ketch.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  6. Website content is minimal or placeholder-like with empty meta descriptions and titles.
  7. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are loaded.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No evidence of security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Pardot, Microsoft Clarity, and Ketch consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, meta tags such as title and description are empty, indicating incomplete SEO implementation. No explicit hosting provider or server details were found. Performance appears moderate based on script usage and content structure. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen reader text present but no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site lacks visible security headers, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports marketing functions but requires enhancements in security and content completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikmak.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikmak.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.