Skip to main content

Security report for mikmak.com

MikMak · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MikMak operates as a technology platform specializing in shoppable media and where-to-buy tools aimed at revolutionizing retail sales for brands. The company provides a B2B SaaS eCommerce platform that integrates shoppable content into marketing strategies, targeting brands and marketers seeking to enhance their retail sales channels. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on HubSpot CMS and leverages multiple modern marketing and analytics tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and technology usage suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on content and technical implementation but has room for improvement in privacy compliance and business credibility transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikmak.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mikmak.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mikmak.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MikMak positions itself as an innovative player in the eCommerce technology sector, focusing on enabling brands to drive retail sales through shoppable media. Its business model is centered on providing SaaS solutions to marketers and brands, integrating interactive shopping experiences into digital marketing campaigns. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics platforms, enhancing its marketing ecosystem. The website's professional design and structured data usage support its market positioning. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of direct contact information may hinder trust for some users. The platform's use of advanced consent management tools indicates awareness of privacy regulations, though explicit policy documentation is missing. MikMak appears to be a medium-sized technology company with a focus on digital retail innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and integration of a consent management platform (Ketch) to handle user privacy preferences. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are loaded securely, and no sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.7.1) poses a potential security risk and should be updated to the latest stable release. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from implementing additional best practices and updating legacy libraries.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Update jQuery and other third-party libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MikMak
Description
Revolutionize your brands' retail sales with our cutting-edge shoppable media eCommerce platform. Seamlessly integrate shoppable content into your marketing strategy and drive sales.
Key services
Shoppable media eCommerce platform, Where to buy tools, Integration of shoppable content into marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Ketch Consent Management, Qualified chat, jQuery 1.7.1, Flickity slider, Slick slider
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management platform (Ketch)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Qualified chat, Ketch Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found
  4. Consent management implemented via Ketch
  5. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts present
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  7. Professional design and structured data usage
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing a combination of modern marketing and analytics technologies such as Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site uses jQuery 1.7.1, Flickity, and Slick slider libraries for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured data (JSON-LD) for video content. Hosting is provided by HubSpot, ensuring reliable uptime and security. Technical debt is indicated by the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of some security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve accessibility, and enhance privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikmak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikmak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.