Skip to main content

Security report for mijnslachtofferzaak.nl

Rijksoverheid · Government · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MijnSlachtofferzaak is an official Dutch government platform designed to provide victims of crimes and their relatives with a centralized overview of their case progress. It aggregates information from multiple justice organizations including the police, Public Prosecution Service, and victim support agencies. The platform leverages secure DigiD authentication to ensure privacy and secure access to sensitive case data. The website is well-branded with consistent government logos and partner endorsements, targeting Dutch residents involved in legal proceedings as victims or next of kin. Technically, the site is built on a modern Angular framework (version 20.1.3) and integrates Matomo analytics for user behavior tracking. The platform supports accessibility features and mobile responsiveness, with multimedia content such as videos with captions enhancing user engagement. The site is served over HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating strong foundational security practices. However, explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are not visibly implemented. From a security perspective, the platform demonstrates good practices including secure login via DigiD and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The domain registration is consistent with the Dutch government entity, with no suspicious WHOIS patterns. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, suitable for its sensitive user base. Strategically, the platform should enhance transparency by publishing security and incident response policies, implement cookie consent for GDPR compliance, and add security headers to harden defenses. These improvements will strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance while maintaining the platform's critical role in victim support services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mijnslachtofferzaak.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MijnSlachtofferzaak occupies a unique position as a government service platform consolidating victim case information from multiple justice organizations. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing by the Rijksoverheid and integration with DigiD for secure authentication. The business model is service-oriented, funded by the government, focusing on transparency and support for victims. The target customers are crime victims and their relatives in the Netherlands. Growth indicators include partnerships with key justice entities and multimedia content to improve user engagement. The ecosystem includes police, Public Prosecution Service, victim support organizations, and justice debt collection agencies, reflecting a comprehensive justice chain collaboration. The platform's operations emphasize data security, privacy, and accessibility, aligning with government digital service standards.

Security posture

The security posture of MijnSlachtofferzaak is solid, leveraging HTTPS with DNSSEC and secure DigiD login integration. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics indicates moderate user tracking with privacy considerations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and incident handling. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies, though cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the platform demonstrates a mature security culture but would benefit from formalizing security governance and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and analytics configurations to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency and user trust by providing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rijksoverheid
Description
MijnSlachtofferzaak is a platform providing victims and their relatives a consolidated overview of their case progress with multiple justice-related organizations.
Key services
Case progress overview, Secure login via DigiD, Information aggregation from police, OM, CJIB, and other partners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 20.1.3, Matomo Analytics, DigiD authentication, SVG logos, Video with captions
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Secure DigiD login integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Dutch government victim case management platform
  2. Secure login via DigiD integrated
  3. Multiple justice partners involved
  4. No exposed security issues detected
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found on main page but linked in footer
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  7. Good accessibility and mobile optimization
  8. Matomo analytics used with moderate tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 20.1.3, indicating a modern and maintainable frontend framework. The use of Matomo analytics reflects a preference for privacy-conscious tracking solutions. Multimedia content such as videos with captions improves accessibility and user engagement. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features like skip navigation links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with preloading of key images and deferred script loading. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the domain uses DNSSEC and HTTPS, indicating a secure infrastructure. There is no evidence of a commercial CMS; the platform appears custom-built for government use. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit cookie consent, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mijnslachtofferzaak.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mijnslachtofferzaak.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.