Skip to main content

Security report for migrosmuseum.ch

Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst is a contemporary art museum based in Switzerland, affiliated with the Migros group. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform for the museum's exhibitions, events, and educational offerings. It targets a general audience interested in contemporary art and culture. The museum holds a reputable position in the Swiss cultural landscape, supported by consistent branding and active social media presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React components and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. Cookie consent is managed through OneTrust, reflecting compliance efforts with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers, a published security policy, and incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages represents a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with moderate technical maturity and a solid security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation, security policies, and accessibility would enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching migrosmuseum.ch

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst operates as a cultural institution under the Migros group, focusing on contemporary art exhibitions and related cultural activities. Its business model revolves around public engagement through exhibitions, events, and educational programs. The museum leverages digital channels including social media and video platforms to reach and grow its audience. While revenue streams are not explicitly detailed, typical sources include ticket sales, sponsorships, and public funding. The museum's partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and content delivery networks. The website reflects a stable and established operation with consistent branding and a clear market position in the Swiss cultural sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust. However, it lacks several best practices such as security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options), published security policies, and incident response contacts. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages indicates compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The security posture is adequate for a cultural institution website but could be improved by adopting comprehensive security policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst
Description
Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst
Key services
Contemporary art exhibitions, Cultural events, Art education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo CDN, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
React (indicated by react-datepicker CSS classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for a cultural institution.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and Vimeo links.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the scanned HTML content.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and React components for UI elements.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. SSL/TLS is properly configured with HTTPS enforced.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React components and integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo CDN, and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and asynchronous script loading. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The site could benefit from additional technical enhancements such as improved accessibility, security headers, and performance optimizations to reduce load times further and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with migrosmuseum.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review migrosmuseum.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.